01 Dec 11
PokerStrategy.com in 2011: Send Us Your Feedback!
The year is coming to an end soon and we want to take this opportunity to ask for your feedback. How did we perform in 2011? What would you like to see improved next year? Let us know in our dedicated thread.
Share your feedback in the forum!
 |
 Niickyy and Viorica holdinglast year's iGB trophies |
Did we create added value for you personally? What are you satisfied with? What did you not like? You can express the results of your recap in two ways.
On one hand - and this is the more important aspect - you can share your opinion on Pokerstrategy.com in 2011 by posting in the dedicated feedback thread:
Give us feedback for the year 2011iGB Awards 2012: PokerStrategy.com nominated 7 times
If you were happy with the services we provided you in 2011, you can also vote for us. Last year, PokerStrategy.com was able to win two awards at the iGB Awards ceremony: Best Poker Affiliate and Best Overall Affiliate.This year, we have been nominated for seven categories:
• Best Poker Affiliate
• Best Overall Affiliate
• Best Affiliate Program - Non-Traditional
• Best Affiliate Program - Overall
• The Lou Fabiano Award for the Best iGaming Community
• Best Affiliate Manager - Non-Traditional (Hannes Hanusch aka
Truthans)• Best Affiliate Manager - Overall (Hannes Hanusch aka
Truthans) iGB Awards 2012: Place your vote hereNote: The voting will be open until Monday, December 12, 2011.
#1
achschelo, 01 Dec 11 13:40
Pokerstrategy failed to take proper care of Fulltilt's victims.Otherwise the site is great - the news coverage, the interesting articles and the coaching videos.
#2
Jan217, 01 Dec 11 13:54
@ #1 what should they have done?#3
achschelo, 01 Dec 11 14:05
offer alternatives to ALL FT players, especially those who exclusively played on FT. They did this only for some players, thus neglecting others, such as myself.#4
amater0001, 01 Dec 11 14:14
IMO, by far best affiliate program.Best freerolls at big poker rooms.
I almost couldn't believe that I get free 50$ at first
even though I had to grind as crazy to withdraw.
#5
datsmahname, 01 Dec 11 15:39
I worry that they don't invest enough in developing high rake players.For instance, I would contribute approx 400x my current rake back to this site if they would find a way to negotiate with stars or get me affiliated through another site I can play at regularly.
As a result, I play on sites I'm not that fond of with small player pools and find little motivation to achieve even gold status.
If you guys tracked me at stars I'd be diamond status without a doubt.
#6
jbpatzer, 01 Dec 11 17:50
PS gave me $250 to donk around with after FT closed.#7
vmarqui, 02 Dec 11 06:15
#5+1
seriously, the only thing diamonds get is a lame video every 6 months.
#8
JohanRember, 02 Dec 11 10:55
#5Don't you think that's their biggest dream? Getting players that are not tagged, to be tagged at the worlds biggest poker site? It's Pokerstars that don't allow it for the obvious reason - Pokerstrategy did not make you open an account at pokerstars. Why would stars reduce their own revenue to be nice when you will play there anyways?
#9
datsmahname, 02 Dec 11 21:45
Its in poker stars interest as well. My volume of play on their site would increase about 20-25%.This is more true of other players who are currently high status on PokerStrategy. If they negotiated a package deal then it could turn out to be win/win.
Its possible they've tried this in the past. Its hard for me to figure out why stars wouldn't be interested.
One way or another I hope they would come to an agreement on something like this.