Long term online poker success with winning strategies – register for free!
|
The best strategies With the correct strategy, poker becomes an easy game. Our authors show you how to succeed, one step at a time. |
The smartest thinkers Learn from and with internationally successful poker pros, in our live coaching sessions and in the forum. |
$50 starting capital PokerStrategy.com is free of charge. Additionally there is a $50 free starting capital waiting for you. |
You are already a PokerStrategy.com member? Log in here
#1
narutomiu, 21 Sep 08 13:02
I like the article overall, but one question I have is, why is average pot size really important, would'nt players, per hand, in a pot better way to judge a table?#2
mouse89, 24 Sep 08 18:19
that were very imformative thank you#3
Ave27, 29 Sep 08 04:20
@ #1 u want the average post size because the higher it is the more money is being bet out and the more money for u to take in. Just cuz more people are coming into the hand doesn't mean they are betting more money. Also you'd rather play heads up with a strong hand anyway u don't wanna go in with AA vs 4 people, u'd rather have one high betting person.#4
RedAirkson, 11 Oct 08 09:01
I see this strategy at work day in and day out. IT WORKS. I play with a deeper stack myself, but I always make sure I get out of these short-stackers' path. The good news is that I'm the exception more than the rule.More often that not, I am treated to an enjoying show as a less-informed big stack takes on the "hapless and desperate short stack"... and then crying in chat about "what a lucky noob the short stacker was" - Always funny when the fish get fried and blame the cook.
#5
bPhoenix58, 28 Nov 08 15:29
There is one thing about this short stack strategy that I don't really understand. I see guys winning more than 100-200 big blinds and not getting out of the table, all the time. And it looks that they are not less succesfull because of that.#6
mug3n, 30 Nov 08 06:47
I don't agree with auto topping-up every time you fall below 20BB. Simply because it's an undefined risk. You can have a bad run and end up topping up over and over and over and even if you leave the table doubling up, your losses from topping would just erase those profits. It'd be better to just switch tables if you find yourself losing so much money that you have to end up topping again and again.#7
Tedi90, 01 Jan 09 19:24
very well made#8
gaztheyorkie, 13 Jan 09 01:47
do you know what this really is great when u look at it you can quickly make a lot of easy cash using this play ok so you dont win a lot per table but each table you visit you take $2.50 hmm how many tbales can you get round in oone session??#9
konnos, 20 Jan 09 21:38
#5 I believe that the reason why is because they are playing big stack strategy which gives your more freedom to the amount of hands to play however it does cost a lot more and there are alot more chips at risk. the good part is if you hit a bad beat you can only really lose $2.00 when he could lose $10.00#10
lokovich, 12 Feb 09 02:09
I believe#11
ContiAno, 16 Feb 09 14:28
i like the structure of these tutorials,videos and articles.very educativethank you