	{"id":2045,"date":"2011-04-29T13:48:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-29T13:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/175\/"},"modified":"2026-06-11T10:52:10","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T10:52:10","slug":"175","status":"publish","type":"strategy","link":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/","title":{"rendered":"Independent Chip Model (ICM)"},"content":{"rendered":"<?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><h1>Independent Chip Model (ICM)<\/h1><h1>1. &Uacute;vod<\/h1><p><b><i>V tomto &#269;l&aacute;nku se dozv&iacute;te<\/i><\/b> <\/p><ul class=\"emoList1\">\n<li><i>Co je to ICM<\/i><\/li>\n<li><i>Jak pou&#382;&iacute;vat ICM<\/i><\/li>\n<li><i>Jak&eacute; programy pracuj&iacute; s ICM a co nedok&aacute;&#382;ou vz&iacute;t v &uacute;vahu<\/i><\/li>\n<\/ul><hr size=\"2\" width=\"100%\"><p>\nP&#345;edstavte si, &#382;e hrajete turnaj Sit and Go na PartyPokeru. Dostali jste se a&#382; na bublinu a nach&aacute;z&iacute;te se na pozici BB. Blindy jsou 300\/600.<\/p><p>CO 10000<br> BU 2000<br> SB 2000<br> BB 6000 (Hero)<\/p><p> Chipleader je extr&eacute;mn&#283; agresivn&iacute; a v&scaron;echny hr&aacute;&#269;e dost&aacute;v&aacute; pod tlak sv&yacute;mi nebezpe&#269;n&yacute;mi all-iny. CO jde all-in, BU a SB zahazuj&iacute; karty. M&aacute;te AKs a odhadujete, &#382;e range hr&aacute;&#269;e na CO je zhruba 90%.<\/p><p>Je pro v&aacute;s takov&aacute; situace spln&#283;n&yacute;m snem o z&iacute;sk&aacute;n&iacute; pozice chipleadera, nebo s t&#283;&#382;k&yacute;m srdcem zahod&iacute;te AKs kv&#367;li riziku, &#382;e se nedostanete k pen&#283;z&#367;m? Co byste ud&#283;lali? Jestli je to pro v&aacute;s jasn&yacute; call, s jak&yacute;mi dal&scaron;&iacute;mi handami byste dorovnali a proti jak&eacute; range byste zahodili AKs? Pokud se sp&iacute;&scaron;e p&#345;ikl&aacute;n&iacute;te k foldu, jak by musela b&yacute;t va&scaron;e handa siln&aacute;, abyste nezahodili? A jak mus&iacute; b&yacute;t soupe&#345; loose, abyste dorovnali s AKs?<\/p><p> Schopnost odpov&#283;d&#283;t spr&aacute;vn&#283; na podobn&eacute; ot&aacute;zky je tou nejd&#367;le&#382;it&#283;j&scaron;&iacute; dovednost&iacute; &uacute;sp&#283;&scaron;n&eacute;ho hr&aacute;&#269;e SnG. M&#367;&#382;ete b&yacute;t dob&#345;&iacute; v po&#269;&aacute;te&#269;n&iacute; f&aacute;zi, ale pokud budete d&#283;lat chyby v pozdn&iacute; f&aacute;zi, budete vyhr&aacute;vat jen vz&aacute;cn&#283;. A pr&aacute;v&#283; zdokonalen&iacute; t&eacute;to dovednosti je hlavn&iacute;m c&iacute;lem tohoto &#269;l&aacute;nku.<\/p><h2>1.1 Z&aacute;klady:<\/h2><p>Tento &#269;l&aacute;nek je ur&#269;en pro pokro&#269;il&eacute; hr&aacute;&#269;e a lze jej pou&#382;&iacute;t p&#345;i vysok&yacute;ch blindech (cca 100\/200 a v&yacute;&scaron;e) pro SnG stejn&eacute;ho form&aacute;tu, jak&eacute; najdete nap&#345;. na PartyPokeru. &#268;l&aacute;nek pokra&#269;uje v rozv&iacute;jen&iacute; znalost&iacute; obsa&#382;en&yacute;ch v &#269;l&aacute;nc&iacute;ch pro za&#269;&aacute;te&#269;n&iacute;ky a p&#345;edpokl&aacute;d&aacute; se, &#382;e zn&aacute;te pojmy jako bublina, fold equity atd.<\/p><h2>1.2 EV a $EV:<\/h2><p>EV: (expected value, o&#269;ek&aacute;van&aacute; hodnota nebo tak&eacute; chip EV) je pr&#367;m&#283;rn&yacute; po&#269;et &#382;eton&#367;, kter&eacute; budete m&iacute;t pot&eacute;, co se rozhodnete pro ur&#269;itou hru. Hra je +EV, pokud zv&yacute;&scaron;&iacute; hodnotu EV.<br> $EV: je hodnota EV v pen&#283;z&iacute;ch. Hra je +$EV, pokud zvy&scaron;uje hodnotu $EV.<\/p><p>Pozn&aacute;mka: jeliko&#382; na sob&#283; nejsou EV a $EV line&aacute;rn&#283; z&aacute;visl&eacute; (pokud se EV zdvojn&aacute;sob&iacute;, nemus&iacute; platit pro $EV to sam&eacute;), existuj&iacute; situace, kter&eacute; mohou b&yacute;t +EV a z&aacute;rove&#328; -$EV. T&#283;mto situac&iacute;m se mus&iacute;te vyhnout, proto&#382;e c&iacute;lem je maximalizovat $EV.&nbsp;<\/p><p>Pozn&aacute;mka: kdy&#382; budeme mluvit o EV, budeme m&iacute;t na mysli pr&aacute;v&#283; $EV, proto&#382;e v turnaj&iacute;ch n&aacute;s zaj&iacute;m&aacute; pouze ona. Ale v tomto &#269;l&aacute;nku budeme rozli&scaron;ovat EV a $EV.<\/p><h1>2. Co je to ICM<\/h1><p>Zkratka ICM (z angl. independent chip model) je synonymem pro model, kter&yacute; p&#345;i&#345;azuje &#382;eton&#367;m hodnotu v pen&#283;z&iacute;ch, tzn. dok&aacute;&#382;e vypo&#269;&iacute;tat $EV z hodnoty EV. Pen&#283;&#382;it&aacute; hodnota va&scaron;eho stacku ($EV) z&aacute;vis&iacute; na pom&#283;ru stack&#367; ostatn&iacute;ch hr&aacute;&#269;&#367;.<\/p><p>Jak se po&#269;&iacute;t&aacute; $EV pomoc&iacute; ICM?<\/p><p>Pro zjednodu&scaron;en&iacute; v&yacute;po&#269;tu $EV z velikost&iacute; stack&#367; budeme br&aacute;t v &uacute;vahu tyto p&#345;edpoklady:<\/p><ul>\n<li>\n<p>V&scaron;ichni hr&aacute;&#269;i hraj&iacute; stejn&#283; dob&#345;e<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Sou&#269;asn&aacute; pozice hr&aacute;&#269;&#367; nen&iacute; relevantn&iacute;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Image hr&aacute;&#269;e u stolu nen&iacute; relevantn&iacute;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul><p> Nyn&iacute; m&#367;&#382;eme vypo&#269;&iacute;tat pro ka&#382;d&eacute;ho hr&aacute;&#269;e pravd&#283;podobnost, se kterou se um&iacute;st&iacute; na prvn&iacute;m, druh&eacute;m nebo t&#345;et&iacute;m m&iacute;st&#283;. <br> To se vypo&#269;&iacute;t&aacute; n&aacute;sleduj&iacute;c&iacute;m zp&#367;sobem: p&#345;edstavte si, &#382;e ka&#382;d&yacute; &#382;eton p&#345;edstavuje los. V&scaron;echny losy se um&iacute;st&iacute; do osud&iacute; a losujeme v&yacute;herce 1. m&iacute;sta. Po tomto losov&aacute;n&iacute; se odstran&iacute; zbyl&eacute; losy v&iacute;t&#283;ze a losuje se druh&eacute; m&iacute;sto. To se opakuje i pro t&#345;et&iacute; m&iacute;sto. Pokud budeme mnohokr&aacute;t opakovat tento postup, z&iacute;sk&aacute;me pravd&#283;podobnost, se kterou se ka&#382;d&yacute; hr&aacute;&#269; um&iacute;st&iacute; na konkr&eacute;tn&iacute;m m&iacute;st&#283;, tak, &#382;e budeme zaznamen&aacute;vat jejich v&yacute;hry. Pomoc&iacute; v&yacute;platn&iacute; struktury pak m&#367;&#382;eme snadno spo&#269;&iacute;tat, kolik hr&aacute;&#269; vyhraje v pr&#367;m&#283;ru. Tak&#382;e pokud m&aacute; Honza 3000 &#382;eton&#367; v SnG s buyinem 10+1$ a na 1.\/2.\/3. m&iacute;st&#283; se um&iacute;st&iacute; s pravd&#283;podobnost&iacute; 15\/17\/20%, pak mu n&aacute;le&#382;&iacute; <\/p><blockquote><p>$EV = 0.15*$50 + 0.17*$30 + 0.20*$20 = $16.6<\/p><\/blockquote><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>V&scaron;imn&#283;te si, &#382;e se v rovnici nezobrazuje p&#345;&iacute;mo velikost stacku. M&iacute;sto n&iacute; jsou vyj&aacute;d&#345;eny pravd&#283;podobnosti na um&iacute;st&#283;n&iacute;, tak&#382;e velikost stacku je zapo&#269;&iacute;t&aacute;na nep&#345;&iacute;mo. Z pohledu matematiky nen&iacute; t&#345;eba prov&aacute;d&#283;t tis&iacute;c simulac&iacute;, k v&yacute;sledku se m&#367;&#382;ete dopracovat pomoc&iacute; podm&iacute;n&#283;n&yacute;ch pravd&#283;podobnost&iacute;. Ale pro na&scaron;e pot&#345;eby bude sta&#269;it p&#345;irovn&aacute;n&iacute; k losov&aacute;n&iacute;.<\/p><h2>2.1 Jak pou&#382;&iacute;vat ICM<\/h2><p>Proto&#382;e te&#271; u&#382; um&iacute;me vypo&#269;&iacute;tat $EV z velikost&iacute; stack&#367;, m&#367;&#382;eme ur&#269;it, jak&aacute; hra m&aacute; vy&scaron;&scaron;&iacute; $EV, a&#382; se budeme rozhodovat pro push-or-fold nebo call-or-fold. A tyto znalosti n&aacute;m umo&#382;n&iacute; rozhodovat se spr&aacute;vn&#283;.<br> Nyn&iacute; se pod&iacute;vejme na v&yacute;po&#269;et $EV v situaci call-or-fold:<\/p><p> $10+$1 PartyPoker SnG, Blinds 300\/600<br> CO 8000<br> BU 2000<br> SB 6000<br> BB 4000 (Hero)<br> CO folds, BU folds, SB pushes All-In 6000, Hero <b>A<\/b><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/cdn-origin.pokerstrategy.com\/smileys\/spade.png\" alt=\"\"><b>9<\/b><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/cdn-origin.pokerstrategy.com\/smileys\/club.png\" alt=\"\"> ??<\/p><p> Domn&iacute;v&aacute;me se, &#382;e na n&aacute;s bude SB vyv&iacute;jet tlak t&iacute;m, &#382;e bude pushovat 85% hand. Proti jeho range je A9 +EV call, ale bude to tak&eacute; +$EV? <\/p><p> Existuj&iacute; t&#345;i r&#367;zn&eacute; sc&eacute;n&aacute;&#345;e:<\/p><ul>\n<li>\n<p>Zahod&iacute;me karty<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Callneme a vyhrajeme<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Callneme a prohrajeme<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul><p>K v&yacute;po&#269;tu $EV pro ka&#382;d&yacute; sc&eacute;n&aacute;&#345; pou&#382;ijeme kalkula&#269;ku ICM:<\/p><blockquote><p>$EV(fold): 21.50$ s 3400 &#382;etony<br> $EV(call a v&yacute;hra): 34.40$ s 8000 &#382;etony<br> $EV(call a prohra): 0$ s 0 &#382;etony<\/p><\/blockquote><p>Abychom z&iacute;skali $EV(call), mus&iacute;me zapo&#269;&iacute;tat do posledn&iacute;ch dvou sc&eacute;n&aacute;&#345;&#367; &scaron;anci na v&yacute;hru: proti soupe&#345;ov&#283; range vyhrajeme v 60% p&#345;&iacute;pad&#367;.<\/p><blockquote><p>$EV(call) = 0.60*$EV(call a v&yacute;hra)+0.40*$EV(call a prohra) = 0.60*$34.4 = ~$20.6<\/p><\/blockquote><p> Nyn&iacute; porovnejme $EV(fold) s hodnotou $EV(call). Je z&#345;ejm&eacute;, &#382;e je lep&scaron;&iacute; zahodit karty, p&#345;esto&#382;e budeme m&iacute;t m&eacute;n&#283; &#382;eton&#367;. D&#367;vodem je to, &#382;e vypadneme na bublin&#283; ve 40% p&#345;&iacute;pad&#367;, p&#345;esto&#382;e se u stolu nach&aacute;z&iacute; dal&scaron;&iacute; shortstack. A pr&aacute;v&#283; ten by profitoval nejv&iacute;ce, pokud bychom callnuli. Pro hr&aacute;&#269;e na SB by byl n&aacute;&scaron; call -$EV (a tak&eacute; -EV). V tomto p&#345;&iacute;pad&#283; by byl fold spr&aacute;vn&yacute; i tehdy, pokud by SB pushoval celou range.<\/p><p> Pod&iacute;vejme se na ten sam&yacute; p&#345;&iacute;klad z pohledu hr&aacute;&#269;e na SB, budeme p&#345;edpokl&aacute;dat, &#382;e m&aacute;me 32o.<br> M&aacute;me dv&#283; mo&#382;nosti a 4 r&#367;zn&eacute; sc&eacute;n&aacute;&#345;e:<\/p><ul>\n<li>\n<p>Fold \t(F)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Push a fold (P,F)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Push, call a v&yacute;hra (P,C,V)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Push, call a prohra (P,C,P)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul><p>Rozhoduj&iacute;c&iacute;m faktorem je to, jak ur&#269;&iacute;me calling range hr&aacute;&#269;e na BB. Karel je TAG, kter&yacute; pou&#382;&iacute;v&aacute; ICM, ur&#269;it&#283; zahod&iacute; A9o a jeho range pro call bude asi 10% (66+, A9s+, ATo+, KJs+). <br> Ctirad je oby&#269;ejn&yacute; hr&aacute;&#269; na n&iacute;zk&yacute;ch limitech, kter&eacute;ho dob&#345;e zn&aacute;me a m&aacute;me velmi r&aacute;di. Jeho range je cca 26% (22+,A2+,KT+,K7s+,QTs+,JTs+).<\/p><blockquote><p>$EV(F) = $28.7<br> $EV(P,F) = $31<br> $EV(P,C,V) = $38.9<br> $EV(P,C,P) = $15.6<\/p><\/blockquote><p>Na&scaron;i $EV(push) vypo&#269;&iacute;t&aacute;me tak, &#382;e tyto hodnoty vyn&aacute;sob&iacute;me jejich pravd&#283;podobnost&iacute;.<br> Proti Ctiradovi vyhrajeme ve 28.4% p&#345;&iacute;pad&#367;.<\/p><p> Na&scaron;e o&#269;ek&aacute;van&aacute; hodnota je tedy $EV(push) = 0.74*$EV(P,F) + 0.26*[$EV(P,C,V)*0.284 + $EV(P,C,P)*0.716] = 0.74*$31 + 0.26*($11+$11) = ~$23+$5.7 = $28.7<\/p><p> Tento p&#345;&iacute;pad je zaj&iacute;mav&yacute; v tom, &#382;e je hodnota $EV pro push i fold toto&#382;n&aacute;. A proto bychom m&#283;li rad&#283;ji zahodit karty: snad jsme lep&scaron;&iacute; ne&#382; n&aacute;&scaron; soupe&#345;, a proto bychom m&#283;li rad&#283;ji zkusit vyu&#382;&iacute;t na&scaron;i edge pozd&#283;ji, ne&#382; abychom se te&#271; pou&scaron;t&#283;li do hazardu, kter&yacute; je break even. <\/p><p> Tentokr&aacute;t vynech&aacute;me v&yacute;po&#269;et, ale proti Karlovi je na&scaron;e $EV(push) = $30 a to znamen&aacute;, &#382;e je to jasn&yacute; push. Proti jeho range vyhrajeme v pouh&yacute;ch 25.3%, ale v 90% p&#345;&iacute;pad&#367; sebereme blindy bez boje. Odhadnut&iacute; soupe&#345;ovy range je stejn&#283; tak d&#367;le&#382;it&eacute; jako to, abyste dok&aacute;zali poznat, kter&yacute; hr&aacute;&#269; dr&#382;&iacute; jin&eacute;mu hr&aacute;&#269;i n&#367;&#382; na krku. To plat&iacute; obzvl&aacute;&scaron;t&#283; pro dobr&eacute; hr&aacute;&#269;e.<\/p><p> Pokud nejste fanou&scaron;ky matematiky a takov&eacute; v&yacute;po&#269;ty v&aacute;s nebav&iacute;, nic se ned&#283;je. Od toho jsou tu programy, kter&eacute; budou po&#269;&iacute;tat za v&aacute;s. Rozhoduj&iacute;c&iacute; dovednost&iacute; z&#367;st&aacute;v&aacute; schopnost odhadnout soupe&#345;ovu range pro push a call.<\/p><h2>2.2 Programy ICM<\/h2><p>Dva nejroz&scaron;&iacute;&#345;en&#283;j&scaron;&iacute; programy pro anal&yacute;zu ICM jsou <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sngwiz.com\/\">SNG Wizard<\/a> a <a href=\"http:\/\/sng-power-tools.software.informer.com\/\/\">SNG Power Tools<\/a>. Oba jsou pom&#283;rn&#283; drah&eacute;, prvn&iacute; stoj&iacute; $99 a druh&yacute; po&#345;&iacute;d&iacute;te za $79. Oba maj&iacute; podobn&eacute; funkce, ale jejich popis nen&iacute; c&iacute;lem tohoto &#269;l&aacute;nku. Doporu&#269;&iacute;me v&aacute;m t&#345;icetidenn&iacute; zku&scaron;ebn&iacute; verzi programu SNG Wizard. Tento program tak&eacute; obsahuje tzv. tr&eacute;nink hry na bublin&#283;. Tato funkce vytv&aacute;&#345;&iacute; n&aacute;hodn&eacute; situace ze zadan&yacute;ch parametr&#367;, jako je pozice, velikost stacku atd., a rozhodnut&iacute; nech&aacute; na v&aacute;s. Pot&eacute; m&#367;&#382;ete nechat vyhodnotit sv&aacute; rozhodnut&iacute;. Toto je dobr&yacute; zp&#367;sob, jak si za&#382;&iacute;t rozhodnut&iacute; podle ICM a jak naj&iacute;t chyby ve va&scaron;&iacute; h&#345;e.<\/p><h2>2.3 Strategie podle ICM<\/h2><p>Je z&#345;ejm&eacute;, &#382;e se bude strategie zalo&#382;en&aacute; na ICM v&#382;dy rozhodovat pro akci, kter&aacute; m&aacute; nejvy&scaron;&scaron;&iacute; $EV. Takov&aacute; hra se naz&yacute;v&aacute; \"hra podle ICM\" a je obzvl&aacute;&scaron;t&#283; d&#367;le&#382;it&aacute; ve h&#345;e se t&#345;emi a&#382; &scaron;esti hr&aacute;&#269;i. Abyste ji mohli vyu&#382;&iacute;t, mus&iacute;te b&yacute;t schopni odhadnout ranges soupe&#345;&#367; a vypo&#269;&iacute;tat $EV. Postupem &#269;asu si pro to z&iacute;sk&aacute;te cit a rozhodov&aacute;n&iacute; bude automatick&eacute;. T&#283;&#382;k&aacute; rozhodnut&iacute; byste m&#283;li analyzovat pomoc&iacute; v&yacute;&scaron;e uveden&yacute;ch program&#367; a tak&eacute; byste je m&#283;li zve&#345;ejnit na f&oacute;ru a diskutovat o nich. Tato strategie povede k mnoha first-in push&#367;m, kter&eacute; budou dost&aacute;vat soupe&#345;e pod tlak, ale all-in budete sami callovat jen m&aacute;lokdy. D&aacute;le se va&scaron;e hra dramaticky m&#283;n&iacute; s velikost&iacute; stacku. C&iacute;lem je vyhnout se st&#345;et&#367;m s big stacky a co nejv&iacute;ce dost&aacute;vat pod tlak hr&aacute;&#269;e s men&scaron;&iacute;mi stacky, ale ne p&#345;&iacute;li&scaron; mal&yacute;mi stacky. Pokud budete middle stack a kolem v&aacute;s budou hr&aacute;&#269;i s mal&yacute;mi stacky, budete hr&aacute;t opatrn&#283;. Agresivn&#283;j&scaron;&iacute; budete tehdy, kdy&#382; budou stacky p&#345;ibli&#382;n&#283; stejn&eacute;. Jako big stack budete hr&aacute;t agresivn&#283; stejn&#283; jako tehdy, kdy&#382; budete jedin&yacute;m hr&aacute;&#269;em se short stackem.<\/p><h2>2.4 Co ICM neum&iacute;<\/h2><p>Auto&#345;i softwaru zalo&#382;en&eacute;ho na ICM v&#269;etn&#283; mnoha hr&aacute;&#269;&#367; hraj&iacute;c&iacute;ch striktn&#283; podle $EV vypo&#269;&iacute;tan&eacute; pomoc&iacute; ICM v&aacute;m &#345;eknou, &#382;e je to perfektn&iacute; a tak&eacute; jedin&yacute; spr&aacute;vn&yacute; zp&#367;sob hry. Ale nen&iacute; tomu tak. Jak jsme ji&#382; &#345;ekli na za&#269;&aacute;tku, ICM nebere v &uacute;vahu dovednosti hr&aacute;&#269;&#367;, image u stolu a pozici. I kdyby byla v programu zapo&#269;&iacute;t&aacute;na dovednost hr&aacute;&#269;e zad&aacute;n&iacute;m edge jako dal&scaron;&iacute; prom&#283;nn&eacute;, st&aacute;le nebudou zohledn&#283;ny r&#367;zn&eacute; dovednosti soupe&#345;&#367;. Dejme tomu, &#382;e n&#283;kter&eacute; rozhodnut&iacute; zv&yacute;&scaron;&iacute; pravd&#283;podobnost toho, &#382;e skon&#269;&iacute;me v heads upu s &uacute;plnou rybou. To by mohl b&yacute;t faktor, kter&yacute; z&aacute;sadn&#283; ovlivn&iacute; va&scaron;e rozhodnut&iacute;. Nebo si p&#345;edstavte, &#382;e zb&yacute;v&aacute; 6 hr&aacute;&#269;&#367; a nach&aacute;z&iacute;te se na UTG se stackem 5 bb. Je z&#345;ejm&eacute;, &#382;e takov&yacute; stack m&aacute; men&scaron;&iacute; hodnotu oproti stejn&eacute;mu stacku na buttonu. Optim&aacute;ln&iacute; hra se tedy li&scaron;&iacute; od ICM tehdy, kdy&#382; se jedn&aacute; o t&#283;&#382;k&eacute; rozhodnut&iacute;. Na druhou stranu je strategie zalo&#382;en&aacute; na ICM velmi bl&iacute;zko optim&aacute;ln&iacute; h&#345;e a tedy je i strategi&iacute;, kter&aacute; se v&aacute;m vyplat&iacute; na t&eacute;m&#283;&#345; v&scaron;ech limitech. Ale m&#283;jte na pam&#283;ti to, &#382;e ICM nen&iacute; v&scaron;e. To plat&iacute; obzvl&aacute;&scaron;t&#283; pro vysok&eacute; buy-iny. V&iacute;ce informac&iacute; se dozv&iacute;te v dal&scaron;&iacute;ch &#269;l&aacute;nc&iacute;ch. D&aacute;le je t&#345;eba myslet na to, &#382;e velmi mal&eacute; stacky (men&scaron;&iacute; ne&#382; 1 bb) a vysok&eacute; blindy mohou zp&#367;sobit chyby ve v&yacute;po&#269;tech ICM. V podobn&yacute;ch p&#345;&iacute;padech rad&#283;ji d&#367;v&#283;&#345;ujte va&scaron;&iacute; intuici ne&#382; vypo&#269;&iacute;tan&eacute; hodnot&#283;.<\/p><h1>3. Shrnut&iacute;<\/h1><p>N&#283;kte&#345;&iacute; z v&aacute;s budou mo&#382;n&aacute; zklaman&iacute;, &#382;e v tomto &#269;l&aacute;nku nena&scaron;li kl&iacute;&#269; ke dve&#345;&iacute;m, kter&yacute;mi by pro&scaron;li a stali se z nich vyhr&aacute;vaj&iacute;c&iacute; hr&aacute;&#269;i na v&scaron;ech limitech. Sp&iacute;&scaron;e to byl z&aacute;klad pro anal&yacute;zu va&scaron;&iacute; hry v pozdn&iacute; f&aacute;zi variant SnG a MTT a pro spr&aacute;vn&aacute; rozhodnut&iacute; v &scaron;ir&scaron;&iacute;m m&#283;&#345;&iacute;tku. Tento &#269;l&aacute;nek nebyl o tom, jak se rozhodovat v jednotliv&yacute;ch situac&iacute;ch. Jejich p&#345;&iacute;klady najdete v dal&scaron;&iacute;ch &#269;l&aacute;nc&iacute;ch a na f&oacute;ru v sekci hodnocen&iacute; hand.<\/p><p> Znalost ICM je bezesporu p&#345;edpokladem ka&#382;d&eacute;ho &uacute;sp&#283;&scaron;n&eacute;ho hr&aacute;&#269;e SnG. ICM je dobr&yacute;m modelem pro v&yacute;po&#269;et $EV v turnaji a z n&iacute; vypl&yacute;vaj&iacute;c&iacute;ch z&aacute;v&#283;r&#367;. Ale je to pouh&yacute; model a v&yacute;sledky na n&#283;m zalo&#382;en&eacute; mohou b&yacute;t nespolehliv&eacute;. <\/p><p> Na z&aacute;v&#283;r v&aacute;m d&aacute;me d&#367;le&#382;itou radu, kter&aacute; zohled&#328;uje slabiny ICM:<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>Podle v&yacute;po&#269;t&#367; plynouc&iacute;ch z ICM prove&#271;te v&scaron;echny +$EV pushe a vyhn&#283;te se v&scaron;em -$EV call&#367;m. Ale existuj&iacute; p&#345;&iacute;pady, kdy je spr&aacute;vn&eacute; zahr&aacute;t -$EV push nebo upustit od +$EV callu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ICM (z angl. Independent Chip Model) je model, kter\u00fd slou\u017e\u00ed jako pom\u016fcka p\u0159i turnajov\u00e9 h\u0159e a \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, jakou pen\u011b\u017en\u00ed hodnotu maj\u00ed v pr\u016fb\u011bhu turnaje va\u0161e \u017eetony.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":""},"strategy_category":[79],"strategy_level":[118],"class_list":["post-2045","strategy","type-strategy","status-publish","hentry","strategy_category-sit-and-go-hodnota-zetonu"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Independent Chip Model (ICM) - Pokerstrategy Czech<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"cs_CZ\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Independent Chip Model (ICM) - Pokerstrategy Czech\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ICM (z angl. Independent Chip Model) je model, kter\u00fd slou\u017e\u00ed jako pom\u016fcka p\u0159i turnajov\u00e9 h\u0159e a \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, jakou pen\u011b\u017en\u00ed hodnotu maj\u00ed v pr\u016fb\u011bhu turnaje va\u0161e \u017eetony.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pokerstrategy Czech\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-11T10:52:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"15 minut\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/175\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/175\\\/\",\"name\":\"Independent Chip Model (ICM) - Pokerstrategy Czech\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-29T13:48:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-11T10:52:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/175\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"cs\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/175\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/175\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Strategies\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Independent Chip Model (ICM)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/\",\"name\":\"Pokerstrategy Czech\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"cs\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Independent Chip Model (ICM) - Pokerstrategy Czech","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/","og_locale":"cs_CZ","og_type":"article","og_title":"Independent Chip Model (ICM) - Pokerstrategy Czech","og_description":"ICM (z angl. Independent Chip Model) je model, kter\u00fd slou\u017e\u00ed jako pom\u016fcka p\u0159i turnajov\u00e9 h\u0159e a \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, jakou pen\u011b\u017en\u00ed hodnotu maj\u00ed v pr\u016fb\u011bhu turnaje va\u0161e \u017eetony.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/","og_site_name":"Pokerstrategy Czech","article_modified_time":"2026-06-11T10:52:10+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"15 minut"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/","url":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/","name":"Independent Chip Model (ICM) - Pokerstrategy Czech","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-29T13:48:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-11T10:52:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"cs","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/175\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Strategies","item":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Independent Chip Model (ICM)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/","name":"Pokerstrategy Czech","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"cs"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/strategy\/2045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/strategy"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/strategy"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"strategy_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/strategy_category?post=2045"},{"taxonomy":"strategy_level","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/strategy_level?post=2045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}