	{"id":2869,"date":"2012-03-03T07:53:00","date_gmt":"2012-03-03T07:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/gigabetovo-dilema\/"},"modified":"2026-06-11T10:59:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T10:59:42","slug":"gigabetovo-dilema","status":"publish","type":"strategy","link":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/","title":{"rendered":"Gigabetovo dilema"},"content":{"rendered":"<?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><h1>Gigabetovo dilema<\/h1><h1>&Uacute;vod<\/h1><p> <\/p><ul type=\"disc\">\n<li><i>Gigabet a klasifikace &#382;eton&#367;<br> <\/i><\/li>\n<li><i>Pravidlo \"p&#283;tat&#345;iceti procent\"<\/i><\/li>\n<\/ul><div style=\"text-align: center;margin-bottom: 12px\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-content\/uploads\/download\/content\/bilder\/ps_trennlinie.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"100%\" height=\"1\"><\/div><p>Jak jste se ji&#382; mohli do&#269;&iacute;st v &#269;l&aacute;nku \"ICM\", existuj&iacute; situace, ve kter&yacute;ch je pou&#382;it&iacute; modelu ICM za hranicemi jeho mo&#382;nost&iacute;. &#268;as od &#269;asu m&aacute; smysl zahr&aacute;t -$EV push z UTG, proto&#382;e v n&aacute;sleduj&iacute;c&iacute; hand&#283; byste museli zaplatit blind, a t&iacute;m byste ztratili fold equity. <\/p><p> Dal&scaron;&iacute; koncept p&#345;i&#345;azuje r&#367;zn&eacute; hodnoty jednotliv&yacute;m &#382;eton&#367;m ve stacku a ob&#269;as vy&#382;aduje, aby se hr&aacute;&#269; rozhodl pro -$EV hru, proto&#382;e &#382;etony, kter&eacute; vs&aacute;z&iacute;te, maj&iacute; men&scaron;&iacute; hodnotu ne&#382; ty, kter&eacute; m&#367;&#382;ete vyhr&aacute;t. M&#367;&#382;e to zn&iacute;t pon&#283;kud abstraktn&#283;, tak&#382;e ud&#283;l&aacute;me v&scaron;e pro to, abychom to v tomto &#269;l&aacute;nku co nejl&eacute;pe vysv&#283;tlili.<\/p><p> <b>P&#345;&iacute;klad 1:<\/b><\/p><p> <b>PartyPoker Step 5 SnG<br> Blindy t50\/t100<br> Zb&yacute;v&aacute; 8 hr&aacute;&#269;&#367;<br> <\/b>Seat 1: MP2 ( t1005 ) <br> Seat 3: MP3 ( t840 ) <br> Seat 4: Cutoff ( t1490 ) <br> Seat 5: Button ( t410 ) <br> Seat 6: SB ( t1495 ) <br> Seat 7: BB ( t2135 ) <br> Seat 9: UTG+2 ( t2080 ) <br> Seat 10: MP1 ( t545 )<\/p><p> <b>Pre-flop:<\/b> Hero is BB with Q<b> <\/b><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/cdn-origin.pokerstrategy.com\/smileys\/heart.png\" alt=\"\">, 3<b> <\/b><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/cdn-origin.pokerstrategy.com\/smileys\/spade.png\" alt=\"\"><br> <span style=\"color: #808080\">2 folds<\/span>, MP2 calls t100, <span style=\"color: #808080\">1 fold<\/span>, Cutoff calls t100, <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">Button raises to t410 and is all-in<\/span>, <span style=\"color: #808080\">1 fold<\/span>,<br> Hero ?<\/p><p>A co te&#271;?<\/p><p> Spousta lid&iacute; by ur&#269;it&#283; &#345;ekla, &#382;e je to jednoduch&yacute; fold. Samoz&#345;ejm&#283; &#382;e m&aacute; button &scaron;ir&scaron;&iacute; pushing range, proto&#382;e mu zb&yacute;vaj&iacute; pouh&eacute; 4 bb. Ale pro&#269; investovat p&#283;tinu stacku do handy, ve kter&eacute; m&aacute;te p&#345;inejlep&scaron;&iacute;m dv&#283; &#382;iv&eacute; karty, nav&iacute;c kdy&#382; jsou za v&aacute;mi dal&scaron;&iacute; hr&aacute;&#269;i? Budeme-li p&#345;edpokl&aacute;dat, &#382;e button pushnul s jak&yacute;mkoli p&aacute;rem, broadway kartami a A7s+, pak m&aacute;te equity necel&yacute;ch 31%. Tak&#382;e nejsp&iacute;&scaron; bude lep&scaron;&iacute; zahodit karty.<\/p><p> Ale hero si v t&eacute;to h&#345;e myslel n&#283;co jin&eacute;ho: <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">Hero re-raises to t2035 and is all-in.<\/span><\/p><p>Hero nen&iacute; jen tak n&#283;jak&yacute; regul&aacute;r nebo fish, ale je to \"Gigabet\", velmi zku&scaron;en&yacute; hr&aacute;&#269; SnG. Pro&#269; se Gigabet rozhodl pro takovou hru, to si vysv&#283;tl&iacute;me pozd&#283;ji.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><h1>Klasifikace &#382;eton&#367;<\/h1><p>Nejd&#345;&iacute;ve se pod&iacute;vejme na to, jak vypadaj&iacute; stacky hr&aacute;&#269;&#367; p&#345;ed handou:<\/p><p> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-content\/uploads\/download\/content\/artikel_daten\/gigabet_dia1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"462\" height=\"384\"> <\/p><p>Praxe ukazuje, &#382;e je t&eacute;m&#283;&#345; jedno, jestli maj&iacute; hr&aacute;&#269;i stejn&eacute; stacky nebo jestli m&aacute; n&#283;kter&yacute; z nich o p&aacute;r &#382;eton&#367; v&iacute;c.<\/p><p> Pokud hr&aacute;&#269; na buttonu pushne, teoreticky by m&#283;l MP1 tuto situaci pova&#382;ovat za all-in (kdy&#382; nebudeme br&aacute;t v &uacute;vahu ostatn&iacute; hr&aacute;&#269;e), proto&#382;e mu po p&#345;&iacute;padn&eacute; proh&#345;e zbude pouh&yacute;ch 135 &#382;eton&#367;, co&#382; je o trochu v&iacute;c ne&#382; jeden big blind. A to ho nespas&iacute;.<\/p><p> Hr&aacute;&#269; na BB m&aacute; pouze o 55 &#382;eton&#367; v&iacute;c ne&#382; UTG+2, ale o to tak&eacute; nejde. Se sv&yacute;mi 2 135 &#382;etony je pro hr&aacute;&#269;e na UTG+2 stejnou hrozbou, jako kdyby m&#283;l 1 800 &#382;eton&#367; - v obou p&#345;&iacute;padech by prohra pro UTG+2 znamenala t&eacute;m&#283;&#345; jist&eacute; vy&#345;azen&iacute; ze hry, proto&#382;e jestli hr&aacute;&#269;i zb&yacute;v&aacute; 280 &#382;eton&#367; nebo &#382;&aacute;dn&yacute;, to vyjde skoro nastejno.<\/p><p> <b>Dva hr&aacute;&#269;i (nebo v&iacute;ce hr&aacute;&#269;&#367;) jsou ve stejn&eacute; skupin&#283; do t&eacute; doby, ne&#382; bude m&iacute;t jeden z nich stack v&#283;t&scaron;&iacute; o 35% ne&#382; ten druh&yacute;.<\/b><b> <br> <\/b><br> Pro&#269; je tomu tak, to si &#345;ekneme pozd&#283;ji. Te&#271; u&#382; v&iacute;te, &#382;e nehraje t&eacute;m&#283;&#345; &#382;&aacute;dnou roli, kter&yacute; hr&aacute;&#269; m&aacute; v&#283;t&scaron;&iacute; stack.<\/p><p><\/p><h1>Klasifikace stack&#367; podle hodnoty &#382;eton&#367;<\/h1><p>Na z&aacute;klad&#283; p&#345;edchoz&iacute;ho tvrzen&iacute;, &#382;e jsou hr&aacute;&#269;i, jejich&#382; stacky se li&scaron;&iacute; nejv&yacute;&scaron;e o 35%, ve stejn&eacute; skupin&#283;, m&#367;&#382;eme rozd&#283;lit 8 hr&aacute;&#269;&#367; z minul&eacute;ho p&#345;&iacute;kladu do &#269;ty&#345; skupin. V n&aacute;sleduj&iacute;c&iacute; tabulce najdete aktu&aacute;ln&iacute; velikosti stack&#367; a spodn&iacute; hranici &#382;eton&#367;, po jej&iacute;m&#382; p&#345;ekro&#269;en&iacute; by hr&aacute;&#269; vypadl ze sv&eacute; skupiny.<\/p><p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-content\/uploads\/download\/content\/artikel_daten\/gigabet_dia2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"534\" height=\"405\"><\/p><p> <b><br> Vysv&#283;tlen&iacute;:<\/b><\/p><p>MP2 m&aacute; se sv&yacute;m stackem asi o 26% v&iacute;ce &#382;eton&#367; ne&#382; MP3, kter&yacute; jich m&aacute; 840. Oba hr&aacute;&#269;i jsou tedy ve stejn&eacute; skupin&#283;. Pro MP2 je 623 spodn&iacute; hranice, pod kterou se nesm&iacute; dostat, aby se udr&#382;el ve sv&eacute; sou&#269;asn&eacute; skupin&#283;. Pokud by m&#283;l 623 &#382;eton&#367;, je to o 35% m&eacute;n&#283;, ne&#382; m&aacute; MP3 se sv&yacute;mi 840 &#382;etony.<\/p><p> Naopak MP3 by je&scaron;t&#283; pat&#345;il do t&eacute;to skupiny, pokud by m&#283;l 745 &#382;eton&#367;, proto&#382;e tentokr&aacute;t by m&#283;l MP2 o 35% v&iacute;ce &#382;eton&#367; ne&#382; MP3. Mo&#382;n&aacute; &#382;e v&aacute;m to p&#345;ipad&aacute; matouc&iacute;, ale pokud si to n&#283;kolikr&aacute;t p&#345;e&#269;tete, ur&#269;it&#283; to pochop&iacute;te.<\/p><p> A tak je to se v&scaron;emi &#269;ty&#345;mi skupinami. Kv&#367;li dv&#283;ma shortstack&#367;m je to sice trochu na hran&#283;, proto&#382;e maj&iacute; pouze 4 a 5 bb, a proto je koncept push or fold d&#367;le&#382;it&#283;j&scaron;&iacute; ne&#382; rozd&#283;len&iacute; velikost&iacute; stack&#367;. Ale p&#345;esto jsme je zapo&#269;&iacute;tali, abychom nic nevynechali.<\/p><p> <b>Pod&iacute;vejme se op&#283;t na p&#345;edchoz&iacute; handu:<\/b><\/p><p> Hr&aacute;&#269; na BB (Gigabet) si v&scaron;iml, &#382;e 410 &#382;eton&#367;, se kter&yacute;mi jde button all-in, mu nijak neubl&iacute;&#382;&iacute;. I kdyby prohr&aacute;l t&#283;chto 410 &#382;eton&#367;, st&aacute;le by se sv&yacute;mi 1 725 &#382;etony pat&#345;il do modr&eacute; skupiny, proto&#382;e spodn&iacute; hranic&iacute; je pro n&#283;j 1 540 &#382;eton&#367;. Pouze pokud by jeho stack klesl pod tuto hranici, m&#283;l by o 35% m&eacute;n&#283; &#382;eton&#367; ne&#382; UTG+2 a t&iacute;m by vypadl z modr&eacute; skupiny.<\/p><p> Push se d&aacute; jednodu&scaron;e vysv&#283;tlit takto: Gigabet chce dostat ze hry oba limpery. Pokud by pouze callnul, riskoval by, &#382;e alespo&#328; jeden z obou limper&#367; callne, nebo dokonce pushne, a takov&aacute; handa by byla pro Gigabeta pom&#283;rn&#283; drah&aacute;. A pr&aacute;v&#283; kv&#367;li tomu pushne s&aacute;m. Rozhodnout, jestli je takov&aacute; hra dobr&aacute;, nebo &scaron;patn&aacute;, obzvl&aacute;&scaron;t&#283; po limpnut&iacute; hr&aacute;&#269;e na MP2, nen&iacute; c&iacute;lem tohoto &#269;l&aacute;nku.<\/p><p> Pro n&aacute;s je d&#367;le&#382;it&eacute;, &#382;e Gigabet p&#345;edpokl&aacute;dal, &#382;e dok&aacute;&#382;e svou handu vyhr&aacute;t proti hr&aacute;&#269;i na buttonu, p&#345;esto&#382;e riskoval call od ostatn&iacute;ch hr&aacute;&#269;&#367;.<\/p><p> Ale pomohou mu tyto &#382;etony? Pokud limpe&#345;i zahod&iacute; a proti shortstackovi vyhraje, bude m&iacute;t 2 795 &#382;eton&#367;, a to je asi o 34% v&iacute;ce, ne&#382; m&aacute; druh&yacute; hr&aacute;&#269; v jeho skupin&#283;, UTG+2. Ale po&#345;&aacute;d bude v t&eacute;to skupin&#283;, i kdy&#382; je to t&#283;sn&eacute;. Ne&#345;&iacute;kali jsme si n&aacute;hodou n&#283;co o tom, &#382;e je t&eacute;m&#283;&#345; jedno, kolik m&aacute;te &#382;eton&#367;, dokud jste po&#345;&aacute;d ve stejn&eacute; skupin&#283;?<\/p><p> Odpov&#283;&#271; na takovou ot&aacute;zku je, &#382;e:<\/p><p> Bez ohledu na to, jestli o tom pr&#367;m&#283;rn&yacute; soupe&#345; v&iacute; nebo ne, dote&#271; nez&aacute;le&#382;elo na tom, jestli m&aacute; jeden ze dvou hr&aacute;&#269;&#367; s podobn&yacute;m stackem o n&#283;co v&iacute;ce &#382;eton&#367; ne&#382; druh&yacute;. Ale Gigabetovi se pomoc&iacute; t&#283;chto m&eacute;n&#283;cenn&yacute;ch &#382;eton&#367; poda&#345;ilo z&iacute;skat v&yacute;hodu. V&iacute;ce se dozv&iacute;te v dal&scaron;&iacute; kapitole tohoto &#269;l&aacute;nku.<\/p><p><\/p><h1>Pravidlo \"p&#283;tat&#345;iceti procent\"<\/h1><p>Pokud byste museli investovat 35% va&scaron;eho stacku, abyste callnuli raise, nerozhodujte se mezi callem a foldem, ale sp&iacute;&scaron;e mezi pushem a foldem, proto&#382;e pokud dostanete na flopu all-in, budete m&iacute;t pot odds alespo&#328; 2:1. Tyto odds budou je&scaron;t&#283; lep&scaron;&iacute;, pokud budou v potu dead money. Jak&aacute;koli handa, kter&aacute; je dostate&#269;n&#283; siln&aacute; pro call, je tak&eacute; pot committed na jak&eacute;mkoli flopu. Ale pokud pushnete p&#345;ed flopem, m&#367;&#382;ete dokonce vygenerovat ur&#269;itou fold equity.<\/p><p> Gigabet p&#345;edpokl&aacute;dal, &#382;e v&#283;t&scaron;ina hr&aacute;&#269;&#367; na jeho stole zn&aacute; toto pravidlo. I kdy&#382; jste o tomto pravidle nesly&scaron;eli, v&#283;t&scaron;ina regul&aacute;r&#367; podv&#283;dom&#283; tu&scaron;&iacute;, &#382;e t&#283;&#382;ko mohou callnout 350 &#382;eton&#367; od v&#283;t&scaron;&iacute;ho stacka, pokud oni sami maj&iacute; jen asi 1 000 &#382;eton&#367;, aby pak zahodili na flopu. Proto&#382;e byste se callem commitnuli, m&iacute;sto toho pushnete a rozhodnut&iacute; nech&aacute;te na hr&aacute;&#269;i, kter&yacute; raisnul. Pokud se nad t&iacute;m zamysl&iacute;te, zjist&iacute;te, &#382;e 350 &#382;eton&#367; je dost na to, abyste mohli hr&aacute;&#269;e se stackem o velikosti 1 000 &#382;eton&#367; postavit p&#345;ed rozhodnut&iacute; \"all-in, nebo fold\".<\/p><p> Obecn&#283;:<br> Mus&iacute;te donutit soupe&#345;e investovat pouh&yacute;ch 35% jeho stacku, abyste ho dostali do all-inu.<\/p><p> Kv&#367;li tomu tak&eacute; plat&iacute; to, &#382;e pat&#345;&iacute;te do t&eacute; sam&eacute; skupiny, pokud rozd&iacute;l &#382;eton&#367; nep&#345;ekro&#269;&iacute; 35%, proto&#382;e v&#283;t&scaron;&iacute; z obou stack&#367; m&aacute; dostatek &#382;eton&#367; k tomu, aby dostal toho druh&eacute;ho do all-inu, ani&#382; by s&aacute;m musel j&iacute;t all-in (ale je m&aacute;lo hr&aacute;&#269;&#367;, kte&#345;&iacute; toho vyu&#382;&iacute;vaj&iacute;).<\/p><p> <b>P&#345;&iacute;klad:<\/b><br> Blindy t50\/t100<br> Seat 1: MP1 ( t1005 ) <br> Seat 2: MP2 ( t1100)<br> Seat 3: MP3 ( t1040 ) <br> Seat 4: Cutoff ( t490 ) <br> Seat 5: Button ( t410 ) <br> Seat 6: SB (Hero) ( t2015 ) <br> Seat 7: BB (Villain) ( t1495 )<br> Seat 8: UTG ( t1050) <br> Seat 9: UTG+1 ( t850 ) <br> Seat 10: UTG+2 ( t545 )<\/p><p> <b>P&#345;ed flopem:<\/b> Hero je na SB<br> <span style=\"color: #808080\">8 folds<\/span>, <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">Hero raises to t525<br> <\/span><\/p><p> Mo&#382;nost a:<span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><br> Hero raises to t525<\/span>, <span style=\"color: #808080\">Villain folds<\/span><br> -&gt; Hero vyhraje t100<\/p><p> Mo&#382;nost b:<br> <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">Hero raises to t525<\/span>, <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">Villain re-raises to t1495 and is all-in<\/span>, <span style=\"color: #808080\">Hero folds.<\/span><br> -&gt; Hero prohraje t525<\/p><p>Villain foldne a hero tak vyhraje big blind, &#269;&iacute;m&#382; o n&#283;co zv&yacute;&scaron;&iacute; sv&#367;j n&aacute;skok (podobn&#283; jako p&#345;i h&#345;e push or fold v heads-upu). Hero je p&#345;ipraven zahodit karty, pokud m&aacute; villain dostate&#269;n&#283; silnou handu, se kterou p&#367;jde all-in podle pravidla 35%. Pokud by se tak stalo, m&#283;l by villain ve skupin&#283; v&#283;t&scaron;&iacute; stack. Ale proto&#382;e je to b&#283;&#382;n&yacute; regul&aacute;r, tento koncept nezn&aacute;, a tedy ani nevyu&#382;&iacute;v&aacute; v&yacute;hod t&#283;chto \"nadbyte&#269;n&yacute;ch\" &#382;eton&#367;.<\/p><p> Faktem je tak&eacute; to, &#382;e hero je chipleader a villain je na druh&eacute;m m&iacute;st&#283; v po&#269;tu &#382;eton&#367;. Aby se villain mohl pustit do chipleadera (nav&iacute;c s mnoha shortstacky kolem), pot&#345;eboval by velmi silnou handu. A proto ve v&#283;t&scaron;in&#283; p&#345;&iacute;pad&#367; hero vyhraje pot ji&#382; p&#345;ed flopem.<\/p><p> Pokud se Gigabetovi poda&#345;&iacute; vyhr&aacute;t proti shortstackovi, bude m&iacute;t o 34% v&iacute;ce &#382;eton&#367; ne&#382; UTG+2. Pak by ho mohl dostat pod velk&yacute; tlak, proto&#382;e by ho mohl postavit p&#345;ed rozhodnut&iacute; \"push, nebo fold\", ani&#382; by se s&aacute;m commitnul. Pro Gigabeta je to t&eacute;m&#283;&#345; tak v&yacute;hodn&eacute;, jako kdyby zdvojn&aacute;sobil sv&#367;j stack. Dal&scaron;&iacute; v&yacute;hodou je to, &#382;e sed&iacute; hned vedle villaina, ale bylo by je&scaron;t&#283; lep&scaron;&iacute;, kdyby na n&#283;j m&#283;l pozici.<\/p><p> Existuje i stinn&aacute; str&aacute;nka tohoto konceptu, kter&aacute; by v&aacute;m nem&#283;la z&#367;stat utajena:<br> Pokud villain re-raisne, hero bude m&iacute;t pot odds zhruba 2:1, kter&eacute; mohou sv&aacute;d&#283;t ke callu. Ale proto&#382;e by hero musel investovat v&iacute;ce &#382;eton&#367;, kter&eacute; maj&iacute; v&#283;t&scaron;&iacute; hodnotu ne&#382; ty, kter&eacute; vsadil, je t&#345;eba zapomenout na pot odds a zahodit karty.<\/p><p><\/p><h1>Shrnut&iacute;<\/h1><p>Jak jsme ji&#382; napsali v &uacute;vodu &#269;l&aacute;nku, model ICM m&aacute; ob&#269;as i sv&aacute; &uacute;skal&iacute;. Nicm&eacute;n&#283; pokud budete modelu ICM dob&#345;e rozum&#283;t a tak&eacute; se j&iacute;m budete &#345;&iacute;dit, budete m&iacute;t dobr&yacute; ROI i v turnaj&iacute;ch SnG a MTT s vy&scaron;&scaron;&iacute;mi buy-iny. Koncept, kter&yacute; je v tomto &#269;l&aacute;nku pops&aacute;n, je ur&#269;en hr&aacute;&#269;&#367;m, kte&#345;&iacute; se ji&#382; dostali na vy&scaron;&scaron;&iacute; &uacute;rove&#328; (buy-in $55+) a cht&#283;j&iacute; je&scaron;t&#283; v&iacute;ce zlep&scaron;it svou hru. Je to dopln&#283;k ji&#382; zn&aacute;m&yacute;ch koncept&#367;, ale zdaleka nen&iacute; tak d&#367;le&#382;it&yacute; jako hra push or fold nebo outy a odds.<\/p><p> Koncept byl pops&aacute;n tak jednodu&scaron;e, jak jen to bylo mo&#382;n&eacute;, proto&#382;e tento &#269;l&aacute;nek by m&#283;l b&yacute;t ch&aacute;p&aacute;n pouze jako z&aacute;klad. Kdokoli se nad t&iacute;m zamysl&iacute;, zjist&iacute;, &#382;e hr&aacute;&#269;i mohou b&yacute;t ve v&iacute;ce skupin&aacute;ch najednou, &#382;e ve skupin&#283; mohou b&yacute;t v&iacute;ce ne&#382; dva hr&aacute;&#269;i atd. Nav&iacute;c nen&iacute; mo&#382;n&eacute; zobrazit hodnotu &#382;eton&#367; jako \"pevn&#283; danou\" tak, jak tomu bylo ve druh&eacute;m grafu. Hodnoty by m&#283;ly b&yacute;t sp&iacute;&scaron;e zobrazeny jako p&#345;echod od sv&#283;tl&eacute; po tmavou barvu. Jak vid&iacute;te, tento koncept se d&aacute; je&scaron;t&#283; o n&#283;co vylep&scaron;it.<\/p><p>Sami se nad t&iacute;m zamyslete a zkuste si tento syst&eacute;m upravit tak, aby v&aacute;m co nejl&eacute;pe vyhovoval.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tento \u010dl\u00e1nek v\u00e1m uk\u00e1\u017ee koncept, podle kter\u00e9ho nemaj\u00ed v\u0161echny hodnoty v turnaji stejnou hodnotu, ale jejich hodnota se li\u0161\u00ed v z\u00e1vislosti na velikostech stack\u016f ostatn\u00edch hr\u00e1\u010d\u016f.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":""},"strategy_category":[114],"strategy_level":[119],"class_list":["post-2869","strategy","type-strategy","status-publish","hentry","strategy_category-sit-and-go-ostatni-clanky"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Gigabetovo dilema - Pokerstrategy Czech<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"cs_CZ\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gigabetovo dilema - Pokerstrategy Czech\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tento \u010dl\u00e1nek v\u00e1m uk\u00e1\u017ee koncept, podle kter\u00e9ho nemaj\u00ed v\u0161echny hodnoty v turnaji stejnou hodnotu, ale jejich hodnota se li\u0161\u00ed v z\u00e1vislosti na velikostech stack\u016f ostatn\u00edch hr\u00e1\u010d\u016f.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pokerstrategy Czech\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-11T10:59:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"12 minut\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/gigabetovo-dilema\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/gigabetovo-dilema\\\/\",\"name\":\"Gigabetovo dilema - Pokerstrategy Czech\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/gigabetovo-dilema\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/gigabetovo-dilema\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/download\\\/content\\\/bilder\\\/ps_trennlinie.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-03-03T07:53:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-11T10:59:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/gigabetovo-dilema\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"cs\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/gigabetovo-dilema\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"cs\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/gigabetovo-dilema\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/download\\\/content\\\/bilder\\\/ps_trennlinie.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/download\\\/content\\\/bilder\\\/ps_trennlinie.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/sit-and-go\\\/gigabetovo-dilema\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Strategies\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/strategy\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Gigabetovo dilema\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/\",\"name\":\"Pokerstrategy Czech\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pokerstrategy.com\\\/cs\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"cs\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gigabetovo dilema - Pokerstrategy Czech","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/","og_locale":"cs_CZ","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gigabetovo dilema - Pokerstrategy Czech","og_description":"Tento \u010dl\u00e1nek v\u00e1m uk\u00e1\u017ee koncept, podle kter\u00e9ho nemaj\u00ed v\u0161echny hodnoty v turnaji stejnou hodnotu, ale jejich hodnota se li\u0161\u00ed v z\u00e1vislosti na velikostech stack\u016f ostatn\u00edch hr\u00e1\u010d\u016f.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/","og_site_name":"Pokerstrategy Czech","article_modified_time":"2026-06-11T10:59:42+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"12 minut"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/","url":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/","name":"Gigabetovo dilema - Pokerstrategy Czech","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-content\/uploads\/download\/content\/bilder\/ps_trennlinie.jpg","datePublished":"2012-03-03T07:53:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-11T10:59:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"cs","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"cs","@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-content\/uploads\/download\/content\/bilder\/ps_trennlinie.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-content\/uploads\/download\/content\/bilder\/ps_trennlinie.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/sit-and-go\/gigabetovo-dilema\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Strategies","item":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/strategy\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Gigabetovo dilema"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/","name":"Pokerstrategy Czech","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"cs"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/strategy\/2869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/strategy"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/strategy"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"strategy_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/strategy_category?post=2869"},{"taxonomy":"strategy_level","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/strategy_level?post=2869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}