![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.pokerstrategy.com\/download\/psmag\/bilder\/bild_kolumne.jpg\")
\n\t\t\t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n \n<\/p>
A ver si me lo guarda a mi...
\n<\/h1>
\nby Bobbs<\/em>\n<\/p> \nIn general you can say: The more information you have about an opponent \nThe last point can be taken into consideration by employing the filter \nFeel free to discuss if there are in fact more By filtering Hands according to the number of players you need a much \n \nThe VPIP and PFR values are mostly useless, since you aren't able to \nExample 1<\/strong> \nWithout notes about whether this player Limp\/Folds \n \n5 Players \nThis screams trap! Without our stats we might have fallen into the trap \nIt is similar when an observant player in the BB with similar stats only completes and we have under 10BB. \n<\/p> \nSB (12 BB) completes \nHere we would like to push loosely, because we give ourselves a lot of \n \n<\/p> \nThe ATS tells us in how many percent of the cases a player from the CO \nSince this value is based on position we additionally filtered our \nWith 5-7 players the blinds are most likely around 100-400 and it \nIf a player has an ATS value >35%, it means that he will try to \nIf you are sitting in the blinds and an aggreisve player raises from \nExample 3<\/strong> 4 folds, BU raises to 500, Hero ?\n<\/p> \nIf the BU has a range of e.g. 22+, Ax, Kx, Q9o+, \n \n<\/p> \nThese values explain themselves. They are especially interesting for \nThe decisive facotr when calculating your pushing range is almost \nIf he is the typcially bad player, who will call a lot of hands, then If he is tight, and we can see this due to PA stats, we can widely extent our expected value.<\/p> \nHere an example:<\/p> Example 4<\/strong> \nPT tells us (100\/100) on x Hands, with the folded BB value coming from a total of ten hands.\n<\/p> \nNash gives us a Pushingrange of 40.0%, \nNow we know however that the Big Blind will call rather tightly. We \nIf we give him a calling range of 10% 55+, ATo+, If our calcuations are accurate we have just vastly expanded our expected return vastly thanks to PT.<\/p> If he calls with a hand outside of his range, we need to once again \n \n<\/p> \nIf this value is close to 100, an obvious \nIf the value is only about 35, he will only bet if he has hit something, and we can easily steal a lot of pots.\n<\/p> \nExample 5<\/strong> CO 2400 raised 200 (ATS 25,Cbet 35) Flop(480) A9s7 \nValues that concentrate on post-flop play are \nAnother potentially interesting value which can be interesting once you \n \n<\/p> \n\t\t\tIt is well possible to attain a good ROI in SNGs without using \t\t\tBut since the program is available for free over \t\t\tUnless someone has technical problems, there is no reason why someone Los jugadores de cash saben lo \u00fatiles que son las estad\u00edsticas de Pokertracker. Su valor potencial en SNGs es a menudo subestimado. Este art\u00edculo te mostrar\u00e1 por qu\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":""},"strategy_category":[50],"strategy_level":[124],"class_list":["post-41470","strategy","type-strategy","status-publish","hentry","strategy_category-sit-and-goes"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\n- whether it be notes, tells or stats - the better you can adjust to
\nhis play and react. That is why nothing speaks against using
\nPokerTracker stats in addition to the obligatory notes, when playing
\nSNGs. There are however some problems with this:\n<\/p>\n
\noption in PokerAce. These are my filter-settings for the amount of
\nplayers:\n<\/p>\n
\nsensible values to take for the above in the feedbackthread. PT-stats
\nare especially helpful if you are playing 10 or more tables and cannot
\nconcentrate fully on each and every table.\n<\/p>
\nbigger sample of hands from each and every player in order to have
\nStats which with sufficient explanatory power. This is why you should
\nnearly always trust your notes more than the values you get from
\nPokertracker. Yet in combination with notes and\/or timingtells - Stats
\nfrom PT can be very helpful in SNGs.<\/p>
\nImportant values which you should have displayed:<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n
\n\n
\n VPIP und PFR<\/strong>\n\t\t\t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>
\ndifferentiate if a 15\/12 player only limps pocket pairs after other
\nlimpers or also first in. If the difference between the two values is
\nvery large on the other hand, such as 40\/25 you can assume that a limp
\nfrom this player in middle position does not represent a very strong
\nhand and that he will fold to a push.\n<\/p>
\n5 Players
\nCO(40\/25) (12 BB) limps
\nBU folds
\nHero SB (7 BB) holds QTo\n<\/p>
\nit is very hard to assume that the CO will fold in this situation. Yet
\nthe existant stats tell us that a fold is more likely than not. Hero
\nshould push here. \n<\/p>
\nExample 2<\/strong>
\nThe table has been very active and there have been lots of pushes
\nagainst limpers. Due to our multitabling we did not notice this nor
\nknow what kinds of hands were pushed. though. \n<\/p>
\nCO(18\/18 over 700 Hands) (12 BB) limps
\nBU folds
\nHero SB (7BB) KQs\n<\/p>
\nand pushed here, especially since we are multitableing with 10+ tables.
\nIt would be better to fold here. \n<\/p>
\nHERO (6 BB) with QJs\n<\/p>
\nfold equity. Yet if he knows that we are multitableing and will often
\nfold against a push, he will only often complete his aces here hoping
\nto provoke a push. \n<\/p>\n\n
\n ATS<\/strong>\n\t\t\t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>
\nor BU will try to win the blinds through a raise, when all other
\nplayers have folded to him. Loose players can have very high ATS values
\nonce play has gotten down to 5-7 or 3-5 players. \n<\/p>
\nhands according to how many players were still at a table this value
\ndoes not become very reliable until we have played very many hands.\n<\/p>
\nbecomes profitable for nearly all players to start stealing blinds.\n<\/p>
\nsteal with a very broad range of his. Yet if we don't know how he will
\nreact against a push, we cannot safely calculate if a push would be
\nprofitable enough. Once again notes can help us here.\n<\/p>
\nthe BU and you hold a hand which is good enough for a push such as AK
\nor QQ, you should open up the Note window before the push and note the
\nblinds, the position and the size of his bet. After the push you should
\nnote the results and how he reacted in order to comlete the note. That
\nway you can keep track of the players that play with often, and gain a
\nmore concrete idea of what part of their range they will fold against
\nresistance.\n<\/p>
\nBlinds 100\/200
\nUTG 2000
\nMP2 3000
\nMP3 3000
\nCO 3000
\nBU 3000
\nSB 3000
\nBB 3000<\/p>
\nQ5s+, JTo, J8s+, T9s (40%) and you only see him call with 33+, A7s+, A4s+,
\nKTs+ (15%) you could profitably re-steal with 22+, Ax, Kx, Q9o+,
\nQ5s+, JTo, J8s+, T9s.\n<\/p>\n\n
\n Folded SB and Folded BB to Steal<\/strong>\n\t\t\t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>
\nplayers whose values are close to 100. With less than 10BB you should -
\nwhen first in become a lot looser when such a player is the BB than
\nwhen playing against an unknown. \n<\/p>
\nalways the stats of the big blind since he will mostly have the widest
\nrange. \n<\/p>
\nhe will have done so several times before the stats are actually
\ndisplayed. This is why you will be easily able to identify such
\nopponents through PA once you have gathered enough hands.\n<\/p>
\nUTG 3500.0
\nUTG+1 4000.0
\nCO 3200.0
\nBU 3000.0
\nSB 2500.0
\nBB 3800.0\n<\/p>
\n22+, Ax+, K2s+, K9o+, Q5s+, Q9o+, J7s+, J9o+, T6s+, T9o, 96s+, 86s+,
\n75s+, 65s, 54s based on the calling range of the SB of 15.4% and of the BB of 17.6%, 44+, A3s+, A7o+, KTs+, KJo+, QJs\n<\/p>
\nhave to take into consideration that the probability that a player who
\ncalls 17,6% of his hands against a Stealraise, will not have held a
\nhand of his range over the last 10 hands is ~14,4%. We can therefore
\nassume that the BB will call even tighter than it is optimal.\n<\/p>
\nA8s+, KQs and keep the calling of the SB, our pushing range increases by 100% to 87,3% 22+, Ax, Kx, Qx, Jx, T3o+, T2s+,
\n95o+, 92s+, 84o+, 82s+, 74o+, 72s+, 64o+, 62s+, 53o+, 52s+, 42s+, 32s.\n<\/p>
\nconsider him looser and correct our pushing range accordingly. If we
\nhad immideatly considered that the player in the BB would always make
\nperfect calls against us, we would have missed lots of potentially
\nprofitable blind steals in many situations.<\/p>\n\n
\n Continuation Bet<\/strong>\n\t\t\t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>
\nadditional option we have is to c\/rAI our strong hands. On good boards
\nwe also have the option of floating.\n<\/p>
\n6 Players \/ Big Blind 80<\/p>
\nHero is BU with 2000 55 called
\nSB folds
\nBB folds<\/p>
\nCO checks, Hero bets 240, CO folds.\n<\/p>
\noften not useful in SNGs, even if they are based on a lot of hands,
\nbecause most decisions are either made pre-flop or on the flop.\n<\/p>
\nhave gathered enough hands is the \"Continuation Bet Turn\" value. If
\nthis is low, but the continuation bet value high, floating can become
\nvery profitable against this type of player.\n<\/p>\n\n
\n » Summary<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n
\n\t\t\tPokertracker. It seems that it is therefore not necessary to buy this
\n\t\t\tprogram to do well.\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tPokerStrategy, nothing speaks against using the information it can
\n\t\t\tprovide. The statistics tell us that it is next to impossible to
\n\t\t\tsufficiently pay attention to the different players at all the tables
\n\t\t\twhen multitabling. Yet with Pokertracker these players are more easily
\n\t\t\trecognizable, and we can more easily notice the traps of good players. <\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tshould not make use of the additional information that pokertracker can
\n\t\t\tprovide.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"