This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] 89s raise or call from CO?

    • _Anonymous_
      PartyGaming - $0.10 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      Don-downhill (BB): $12.67
      andreitsch (UTG): $10.40
      THRAV (MP): $6.48
      Bobble (CO): $9.75
      HDS1969 (BTN): $10.00
      turki885 (SB): $2.74

      turki885 posts SB $0.05, Don-downhill posts BB $0.10

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Bobble has 8:club: 9:club:

      fold, fold, Bobble calls $0.10, HDS1969 raises to $0.50, fold, fold, Bobble calls $0.40

      Flop: ($1.15, 2 players) 4:heart: 7:heart: 8:diamond:
      Bobble bets $0.73, HDS1969 calls $0.73

      Turn: ($2.61, 2 players) A:heart:
      Bobble bets $1.24, HDS1969 calls $1.24

      River: ($5.09, 2 players) Q:diamond:
      Bobble checks, HDS1969 bets $1.30, fold

      HDS1969 wins $4.84

      Hello, what would had been the right move against loose players on this table? Should I have raised first in or was that call a good move?

  • 2 replies
    • CPallo
      Joined: 12.04.2012 Posts: 4,350
      I had raised first in. Hands like 89s don't play that well OOP and without initiative.

      If those guys are 3-betting a lot then I would probably consider folding, especially if that BU is the loose and 3-betting guy.
    • BogdanPS
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Why would we just call first in?

      We should always take initiative and raise the hand preflop.

      If the opponents are loose and 3-bet you a lot you can fold these hands preflop.

      Calling and then calling raises will be a sure way to lose money in the long term as you proceed to see a flop (in a biger pot) without initiative and a speculative hand.