This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

Micro HU Super Turbo SnG

    • elhh82
      Joined: 03.09.2008 Posts: 6,838
      Do you think these 300 chip SnGs on FTP are beatable by just using SAGE?

      They start with 10BB.

      Variance would probably be high, but i think given the fishiness of the micros, sage could be good enough to crush this?
  • 3 replies
    • elhh82
      Joined: 03.09.2008 Posts: 6,838
      i'm thinking of playing push with SAGE / Nash.

      if they limp and i can't push, continue and shove with mid pair or better, if the board texture is ok.

      you think we can beat the 5% rake on the $2+0.1 with this?
    • Kimber88
      Joined: 08.07.2008 Posts: 1,333
      When these first came out I followed the HU SNG regs thread on 2+2 very close, and the conclusion was that they were extremely addictive but not beatable long term.

      This is my only reference as I don't play them myself. But good luck if you decide to try.
    • nibbana
      Joined: 04.12.2009 Posts: 1,186
      Using SAGE, if you have 7 BB's and are in the BB, you're calling with a power index of 30+. The weakest hand you will call with is J6s BUT you will exclude hands which sngWiz dictates you should call within the range of J6s.

      J6s = 11x2 + 6 + 2 = 30 (bottom of 49% range)
      Q5o = 12x2 + 5 = 29 (bottom of 46.9% range)
      89s = 9x2 + 8 + 2 = 28 (bottom of 46% range)
      22 = 2x2 + 2 + 22 = 28 (bottom of 22.5% range)

      It seems like the Power Index is a quickfire way to establish a "score" for your hand but doesn't seem to agree with the ranges that sngWiz specifies. In the bottom example sngWiz considers 22 to be a top 22.5% hand whereas SAGE considers it to only be a 28/67 hand.

      For me it is this anomaly which makes SAGE exploitable.