This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Nl5 SH 33 BU

    • alexgrapid
      Joined: 20.12.2008 Posts: 242
      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.02/$0.05 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)

      Known players:
      BU (Hero):

      Preflop: Hero is BU with 3, 3.
      2 folds, CO raises to $0.15, Hero calls $0.15, 2 folds, BB folds.

      Flop: ($0.37) K, 9, 9 (2 players)
      CO bets $0.20, Hero calls $0.20.

      Turn: ($0.77) Q (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero bets $0.50, CO calls $0.50.

      River: ($1.77) 7 (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero bets $1.15, CO calls $1.15.

      Final Pot: $4.07.

      Results follow:

      CO shows two pairs, kings and nines(Kd Tc).
      Hero shows two pairs, nines and threes(3s 3c).

      CO wins with two pairs, kings and nines(Kd Tc).

      Here I tried to bluff the villain but he didn't throw his hand , he was 25/17 AF 1 WTSD30 198 hands . On turn I could represent 10 J or even a 9 or a better K I had taggish stats so I didn't had a maniac image at the table . My question is if this bluff could have been succesfull at all. I think that the bets on turn and river were too small . Thank you
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello alexgrapid,

      I'd often times just play the standard play with the small PP, if I don't hit I just fold the hand, and no hard decisions at all. And as you played and floated on flop then rather just bet the turn and give it up to further action so Check behind on river.

      Best regards.