So i was wondering these days, and decided to pull a thread out of it to try finding out from more experienced Pokerstars players, and even more studied on ICM players about this.
How does variance and gameplay changes on these both poker rooms, as the structure is slightly different i believe that somehow Pokerstars could be a little more easier to think as you're either pretty early all the time, or push-or-fold at the end? I really have no idea as i didn't play that much on PS, and when i did, i wasn't thinking like that.
Structure differs of 6 minute blinds on FT, and 10 minute blinds on PS. But the blind change is way different, and also PS has antes. As FT bb goes after 60 minutes of play in a blind structure of (t30/t40/t50/t60/t80/t100/t120/t160/t200/t300) and on PS we get a (t20/t30/t50/t100/t150/t200)
I'm pretty decent on regulars on Full Tilt tbh, with a solid ROI on low stakes ($5+$0.50 & $10+$1), but now thinking to invest in my career, what are pros and cons on both sites? Any idea guys? How strategy must be adapted?