FR, NL 10, 25 & 50. Softer on Stars or FT?

    • PocketAcesJohn
      PocketAcesJohn
      Bronze
      Joined: 19.06.2008 Posts: 1,116
      Which of these two sites do you think offer the softer FullRing cash games at the above stakes?

      Personally i belive its Pokerstars. But i find this hard to believe as on average games at Full Tilt are looser. For some wierd reasson i seem to do better at Pokerstars.
  • 9 replies
    • i5bet72o
      i5bet72o
      Bronze
      Joined: 17.06.2010 Posts: 1,615
      i have only played rush on FT, but stars is softer than rush games imo.
    • BLOWMEBABE
      BLOWMEBABE
      Bronze
      Joined: 24.01.2010 Posts: 222
      On these limits you will always find a free table of any of these sites.
      The question is how many tables you'll want to play at 8 or 24? I dont see big difference between these sites. I would prefer FTP.
    • JonikoP
      JonikoP
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.05.2010 Posts: 600
      Not much to choose between them in my view. Reckon some of the Euro facing sites are softer but the software isn't as good.

      Question for i5bet72o (and others) - do you think the Rush games in general are tougher than the regular games on FTP?

      Randomly, at NL10 I find Rush softer but at NL25 I find regular games softer.
    • peche025
      peche025
      Bronze
      Joined: 14.12.2008 Posts: 1,387
      IMO rush is much harder than regular tables, my experience is NL100 FR. There are just so many more and better regs on every rush table.
    • i5bet72o
      i5bet72o
      Bronze
      Joined: 17.06.2010 Posts: 1,615
      Joniko: I have not played standard tables on FT, but rush tables r tougher than normal tables at both party and stars.
    • AlCaTrAzzALZ
      AlCaTrAzzALZ
      Bronze
      Joined: 06.05.2008 Posts: 726
      so why play rush then? when 24 tables at stars gives a similar hand/hour rate, and if you use something like AHK or tableninja is just as easy to control?
    • i5bet72o
      i5bet72o
      Bronze
      Joined: 17.06.2010 Posts: 1,615
      AlCaTrAzz: no imo, rush is way easier than 24 tabling even with a AKH.
    • goldchess
      goldchess
      Bronze
      Joined: 17.02.2010 Posts: 641
      Originally posted by PocketAcesJohn
      Personally i belive its Pokerstars. But i find this hard to believe
      :f_confused:
    • PocketAcesJohn
      PocketAcesJohn
      Bronze
      Joined: 19.06.2008 Posts: 1,116
      Originally posted by goldchess
      Originally posted by PocketAcesJohn
      Personally i belive its Pokerstars. But i find this hard to believe
      :f_confused:
      Originally posted by PocketAcesJohn
      Personally i belive its Pokerstars. But i find this hard to believe as on average games at Full Tilt are looser. For some wierd reasson i seem to do better at Pokerstars.
      You'd expect to make more against Bad+Loose players rather than Bad+Tight players.........

      I believe pokerstars because my winrate is higher. But still find it hard believing as games are noticabley tighter....

      Less confused now?