This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL10 AA vs tight passive

    • h0m1e
      Joined: 28.03.2010 Posts: 223
      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)

      Known players:
      BB (Hero):

      Preflop: Hero is BB with A, A.
      MP3 calls $0.10, 3 folds, Hero raises to $0.50, MP3 calls $0.40.

      Flop: ($1.05) K, J, 9 (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.70, MP3 calls $0.70.

      Turn: ($2.45) 8 (2 players)
      Hero bets $1.40, MP3 calls $1.40.

      River: ($5.25) K (2 players)
      Hero checks, MP3 raises to $7.40(All-In), Hero folds, MP3 gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $5.25.

      Opp is 18/6/1/67/18/137(vpip/pfr/AF/fold to cbet/wtsd/hands)
      Pretty much a bad flop , he could have hit in a numerous ways,but still I wanted to protect my rockets.
      On the river I just give up,he's way too passive to bluff all-in without some sort of nuts.
      Standard fold on river right??
      Opinions?Should I bet more on turn like 1,70???
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello h0m1e,

      Turn: I'd likely bet it bigger, as you mentioned $1.70 should do it.

      As played
      River: I like also the line Check/Call here, since we induce a bet from any kind of draws but as he jams in then we can likely accept the truth that we are behind, nice fold!

      Best regards.