[NL2-NL10] NL10 AA vs tight passive

    • h0m1e
      Joined: 28.03.2010 Posts: 223
      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)

      Known players:
      BB (Hero):

      Preflop: Hero is BB with A, A.
      MP3 calls $0.10, 3 folds, Hero raises to $0.50, MP3 calls $0.40.

      Flop: ($1.05) K, J, 9 (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.70, MP3 calls $0.70.

      Turn: ($2.45) 8 (2 players)
      Hero bets $1.40, MP3 calls $1.40.

      River: ($5.25) K (2 players)
      Hero checks, MP3 raises to $7.40(All-In), Hero folds, MP3 gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $5.25.

      Opp is 18/6/1/67/18/137(vpip/pfr/AF/fold to cbet/wtsd/hands)
      Pretty much a bad flop , he could have hit in a numerous ways,but still I wanted to protect my rockets.
      On the river I just give up,he's way too passive to bluff all-in without some sort of nuts.
      Standard fold on river right??
      Opinions?Should I bet more on turn like 1,70???
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello h0m1e,

      Turn: I'd likely bet it bigger, as you mentioned $1.70 should do it.

      As played
      River: I like also the line Check/Call here, since we induce a bet from any kind of draws but as he jams in then we can likely accept the truth that we are behind, nice fold!

      Best regards.