[NL2-NL10] 64s from CO

    • Alficor1
      Alficor1
      Bronze
      Joined: 16.06.2010 Posts: 7,291
      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)

      Known players:
      CO (Hero):
      $21.38
      BU:
      $9.59
      SB:
      $10.00
      BB:
      $30.40
      MP2:
      $10.00
      MP3:
      $12.51


      Preflop: Hero is CO with 4, 6.
      MP2 folds, MP3 raises to $0.40, Hero calls $0.40, 2 folds, BB calls $0.30.

      Flop: ($1.25) 4, 4, A (3 players)
      BB checks, MP3 checks, Hero bets $0.95, BB folds, MP3 calls $0.95.

      Turn: ($3.15) K (2 players)
      MP3 bets $1.50, Hero calls $1.50.

      River: ($6.15) 3 (2 players)
      MP3 bets $4.10, Hero calls $4.10.

      Final Pot: $14.35.

      Results follow:

      MP3 shows a full-house, kings full of fours(Kd Kc).
      Hero shows three of a kind, fours(4h 6h).

      MP3 wins with a full-house, kings full of fours(Kd Kc).

      Fold pre, wait for aces? I dont think i can fold this hand here, although his check call on the folp and lead on the turn/river looked mighty strong. I stil dont think he'd play AK differently tho. Villain was 14/12 2,2.

      Happy new year to you guys! Thanks for fantastic job you're doing! :f_love:
  • 4 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Alficor1,

      Preflop: Yeah, actually fold it here. :) I don't think that you are able to play those hands profitable, but of course it's doable. But those don't hit often enough, also against known opponent, its better. Just check those hands in your program, like how do you play suited 1gappers.

      Postflop: Should be fine, sometimes I might even consider playing for stacks here, since there are a lot worse Aces and etc hands with may us pay off easily. :)

      Best regards.
    • Alficor1
      Alficor1
      Bronze
      Joined: 16.06.2010 Posts: 7,291
      Yeah, those hands are not profitable for me. :s_cry: But 64 of hearts looks so pretty... :D
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by Alficor1
      Yeah, those hands are not profitable for me. :s_cry: But 64 of hearts looks so pretty... :D
      Lol, that ain't an excuse. Every hand could look pretty if you take from that view. :D
    • Alficor1
      Alficor1
      Bronze
      Joined: 16.06.2010 Posts: 7,291
      Well for example 72 offsuit isnt pretty at all by any means. :D But i mean 64s is so pretty, i dont have the heart to fold it. :f_biggrin: