This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL50 SH vs. 4bet

    • twinn1
      Joined: 09.03.2009 Posts: 2,268
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.50(BB) Replayer
      SB ($91.72)
      BB ($81.87)
      UTG ($59.84)
      UTG+1 ($7.87)
      CO ($52.75)
      Hero ($109)

      Dealt to Hero Q:heart: Q:club:

      UTG raises to $2, fold, CO calls $2, Hero raises to $7, fold, BB raises to $25.25, fold, fold, fold

      BB wins $18.25

      UTG and CO are fish.
      BB is winning reg, 18/14/12k hands, 3bet 7.4, 4bet 8%.

      In 100BB game i am playing for stacks because my 3bet looks like squeez and his range can be wider. But we are 160BB deep and he makes the 4bet so big... i dont like 5 betting.
      What do you think?
  • 2 replies
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      He often has there AK, but since he is not never really do that as bluff and he would likely not 4b JJ/TT that spot then I´m fine 3b folding QQ
      No point really increase variance and flip for 160bb if you´re quite sure he is not 4b bluffing or 4b/calling with worse hands than yours
    • BogdanPS
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      I agree with Kaitz. This should be a fold preflop (AK is a fold as well here).

      Another option you have in this hand is to call preflop and allow villain to squeeze given that his is quite 3-bet happy. I would be very inclined to do so if the openers weren't super fish. If they are very fishy like you seem to imply then isolating one (or both) is definitely better.