This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL2 44 pfa versus small donkbet on flop

    • member001
      member001
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.03.2010 Posts: 288
      Known players:
      Position:
      Stack
      UTG1:
      $2.69
      Hero:
      $2.11

      0.01/0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant 0.85 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is BU with 4:heart: , 4:diamond:
      UTG1 calls $0.02, 5 folds, Hero raises to $0.08, 2 folds, UTG1 calls $0.06.

      Flop: ($0.19) K:diamond: , 6:heart: , 5:heart: (2 players)
      UTG1 bets $0.06, Hero calls $0.06.

      Turn: ($0.31) A:diamond: (2 players)
      UTG1 checks, Hero bets $0.18, UTG1 folds, Hero gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $0.31


      Flop: villain's small donk makes me think he has a weak hand. He knows that if he checks I am always cbetting such a flop, so if he really has a good hand I think he will check/call or check/raise. (Unless he is being super tricky and playing "bet small for raise induce", but I don't think so in 39/0 player.)

      Turn: when he insta-checks I think he has given up after seeing the A, and I can bet and take the pot. I guess he had some kind of middle pp.

      I'm not sure whether this was ok, or whether it would have been better for me to raise/fold the flop. Thanks for any advice.
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello member001,

      Preflop: Usually I'd do $0,10, for 1 limper being in the pot as well.
      Flop: While often times such donks are pretty weak then you could as well just raise it up even.

      As played
      Turn: I'd even make the bet bigger like $0,22 or something similar.

      Best regards.