[NL2-NL10] nl2 - full house

    • jockel80
      jockel80
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.11.2010 Posts: 31
      Known players:
      Position:
      Stack
      Hero:
      $2,58
      BU:
      $1,95

      0,01/0,02 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant.Base 0.99 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is BB with J:heart: , 5:heart:
      3 folds, BU calls $0,02, SB folds, Hero checks.

      Flop: ($0,05) Q:club: , J:spade: , J:diamond: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BU checks.

        I should have bet here!? I wanted to play check/raise.

      Turn: ($0,05) 4:spade: (2 players)
      Hero bets $0,05, BU calls $0,05.

      River: ($0,15) 4:diamond: (2 players)
      Hero bets $0,1, BU raises to $0,32, Hero raises to $1,56, BU raises to $1,88 (All-In), Hero calls $0,32.

        I thought he could have a hand like 45 that makes sense. With QQ or 44 I tought he would have bet or raised earlier. So is going broke ok here? (Well, I didnt realize that his stack was just 0,3$ smaller than my reraise :D )

      Final Pot: $3,91

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      BU shows a full-house, jacks full of queens (Qd Jc)
      Hero shows (Jh 5h)

      BU wins with a full-house, jacks full of queens (Qd Jc)
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello jockel80,

      Bet flop, bet turn. But as played, I guess shouldn't be that wrong to go broke there, although the problem is that the opponent is rather passive, and I guess most of the time we will be splitting there or against some even bigger nuts. Therefore I might even prefer just Calling his raise while we are in freeplay pot and people tend to now overplay their hand that often here. And as well while we Call there we avoid paying the rake. :)

      Best regards.