Poker rules need to be changed

    • Dumbledork
      Dumbledork
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.07.2010 Posts: 101
      Once again I had to tolerate the injustice that is the flush. Honestly, the flush is much too strong. I have the impression it's much easier to get a flush than a straight or even three of a kind.
  • 4 replies
    • konkey
      konkey
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.12.2009 Posts: 385
      Yeah, you are right.
      It was proven around 19:00 GMT today
      That's the reason people from FBI are seizing all pokerrooms now
    • Hlynkinn
      Hlynkinn
      Bronze
      Joined: 14.06.2008 Posts: 4,998
      Originally posted by konkey
      Yeah, you are right.
      It was proven around 19:00 GMT today
      That's the reason people from FBI are seizing all pokerrooms now
      lmao
    • Alficor1
      Alficor1
      Bronze
      Joined: 16.06.2010 Posts: 7,291
      All hands should have the same rank, because its as likely to make one pair as to make a royal. Therefore the best bluffer should always get all the maney.
    • Navrark
      Navrark
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.01.2010 Posts: 313
      Originally posted by Dumbledork
      Once again I had to tolerate the injustice that is the flush. Honestly, the flush is much too strong. I have the impression it's much easier to get a flush than a straight or even three of a kind.
      What would be nice is if the two hands tie, the person with the best hand apart from the Flush wins. Example:

      Board: A :heart: 2 :heart: J :heart: 6 :heart: Q :heart:

      Hero: A :club: J :club:

      Villain: A :spade: 2 :diamond:

      Who should win in this situation? Instead the donk gets half the pot.

      I faced this situation the other day at Full Tilt. I was so angry after that I phoned up the FBI to complain. I hope they do something about it!

      Board: A :heart: A :spade: K :diamond: 6 :club: 4 :spade:

      Hero: A :club: K :club:

      Villain: A :heart: A: :diamond:

      :s_o: :s_biggrin: