This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL5 QJs BvB

    • acceleration123
      acceleration123
      Gold
      Joined: 11.12.2010 Posts: 5,312
      c/r is not nice at all but I think and think about this .. and I think his range on the turn could look like this:

      Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

      1,760 games 0.005 secs 352,000 games/sec

      Board: 5h 5c 9s Qd
      Dead:

      equity win tie pots won pots tied
      Hand 0: 46.364% 41.93% 04.43% 738 78.00 { QhJh }
      Hand 1: 53.636% 49.20% 04.43% 866 78.00 { KJs+, QTs-Q9s, A5o, KJo+, QTo-Q9o }

      so I´d get the necessary equity to call which is around 25%.

      Yes, No, maybe ??

      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.02/$0.05 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)

      Known players:
      MP1:
      $5.00
      MP2:
      $5.40
      MP3:
      $1.88
      CO:
      $4.82
      BU:
      $2.77
      SB:
      $2.06
      BB (Hero):
      $7.30
      UTG1:
      $5.09
      UTG2:
      $1.77


      Preflop: Hero is BB with Q, J.
      7 folds, SB calls $0.03, Hero raises to $0.20, SB calls $0.15.

      Flop: ($0.4) 5, 5, 9 (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $0.25, SB calls $0.25.

      Turn: ($0.9) Q (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $0.50, SB raises to $1.61, Hero calls $1.11.

      River: ($4.12) J (2 players)


      Final Pot: $4.12.
  • 2 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello acceleration123,

      We need like 27% equity there and against some kind of wider range, I'd even widen up the range:

      Board: 5:heart: 5:club: 9:spade: Q:diamond:
      Equity Win Tie
      UTG 72.91% 70.22% 2.69% { 99, 55, AQs, KJs+, QTs-Q9s, 75s, 65s, 54s, AQo, A5o, KJo+, QTo-Q9o, 75o, 65o, 54o }
      UTG+1 27.09% 24.40% 2.69% { QhJh }

      we ain't getting it that easily. But overall I guess against his stack it's not like a very big mistake while we might even see sometimes from his side be a bit wider range.

      Best regards.
    • acceleration123
      acceleration123
      Gold
      Joined: 11.12.2010 Posts: 5,312
      I worked with the assumption that he is raising pre 77+ and as well AQ. Therefore I excluded from his range AQ and 99. But it´s true I´ve already seen guys just limping very strong hands pre on NL5 and also NL10.