This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL50. 2nd pp vs passive villain

    • AlexGerasim
      Joined: 19.01.2009 Posts: 1,021
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.50(BB) Replayer
      Hero ($56.80)
      BB ($66.55)
      BTN ($11.95)

      Dealt to Hero 8:spade: 8:heart:

      fold, Hero raises to $1.50, BB calls $1

      FLOP ($3) 3:club: T:spade: 7:club:

      Hero bets $2, BB calls $2

      TURN ($7) 3:club: T:spade: 7:club: 5:club:

      Hero checks, BB bets $3, Hero calls $3

      RIVER ($13) 3:club: T:spade: 7:club: 5:club: 5:heart:

      Hero checks, BB bets $7, Hero folds

      BB wins $12.35


      Now I don't see any worse hand in his range on the turn, but when I was playing I thought that it's pretty standard pot control.

      R: It's obviously fold
  • 2 replies
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      don´t see how you think turn is standard c/c and river is easy c/f
      88 that board is not really too bad hand, since a lot of times players would float you on that flop to take it away on the turn and his betting range on the river is generally Tx+ so I think getting these odds I´d either call him down or c/f turn
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello AlexGerasim,

      Flop: I'd even CBet it bigger here ~$2,50.
      Turn: And here against passive opponent I'd basically just Bet/Fold myself. Don't really like the Check/Fold while we still might have the best hand or either Check/Call against passive opponent. And usually my plan is to Bet/Fold the turn and Check/Fold the river.

      As played
      River: When we put him into induce-bluff line then rather Call the river as well, your play doesn't really make sense.

      Best regards.