[NL20-NL50] NL50. 2nd pp vs passive villain

    • AlexGerasim
      Joined: 19.01.2009 Posts: 1,021
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.50(BB) Replayer
      Hero ($56.80)
      BB ($66.55)
      BTN ($11.95)

      Dealt to Hero 8:spade: 8:heart:

      fold, Hero raises to $1.50, BB calls $1

      FLOP ($3) 3:club: T:spade: 7:club:

      Hero bets $2, BB calls $2

      TURN ($7) 3:club: T:spade: 7:club: 5:club:

      Hero checks, BB bets $3, Hero calls $3

      RIVER ($13) 3:club: T:spade: 7:club: 5:club: 5:heart:

      Hero checks, BB bets $7, Hero folds

      BB wins $12.35


      Now I don't see any worse hand in his range on the turn, but when I was playing I thought that it's pretty standard pot control.

      R: It's obviously fold
  • 2 replies
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      don´t see how you think turn is standard c/c and river is easy c/f
      88 that board is not really too bad hand, since a lot of times players would float you on that flop to take it away on the turn and his betting range on the river is generally Tx+ so I think getting these odds I´d either call him down or c/f turn
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello AlexGerasim,

      Flop: I'd even CBet it bigger here ~$2,50.
      Turn: And here against passive opponent I'd basically just Bet/Fold myself. Don't really like the Check/Fold while we still might have the best hand or either Check/Call against passive opponent. And usually my plan is to Bet/Fold the turn and Check/Fold the river.

      As played
      River: When we put him into induce-bluff line then rather Call the river as well, your play doesn't really make sense.

      Best regards.