This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] nl2 JJ

    • Jim4rdo
      Joined: 03.10.2010 Posts: 1,252
      This one confuses me too.

      I can't figure out what he has.

      Villian 12/8 over 50.

      Calling on that flop, then checking turn, then pot betting on the river?

      Maybe AQ and was just floating? Failed flush draw? He'd have to have a good read on me to pot bet with that?

      Perhaps I should have bet the turn as a scare card, and it would have given me an indication as to if he was drawing or hit the queen? Since also c-betting the flop then checking on that card, pretty much looked as if it scared me/beat my pair?


      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.01/$0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)

      Known players:
      BU (Hero):

      Preflop: Hero is BU with J, J.
      2 folds, CO raises to $0.07, Hero calls $0.07, SB folds, BB calls $0.05.

      Flop: ($0.22) 4, 7, 3 (3 players)
      BB checks, CO checks, Hero bets $0.14, BB folds, CO calls $0.14.

      Turn: ($0.5) Q (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero checks.

      River: ($0.5) Q (2 players)
      CO bets $0.50, Hero folds, CO gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $0.5.
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Jim4rdo,

      Yes, rather Bet the turn than Check it behind. We still get value from a lot of pairs and even draws. And as played I would rather Call it while he may even do that with missed draws, which saw you being weak and of course weaker pairs/PPs unless he is really some kind of passive side player.

      Best regards.