Hey
I read this book a while back "Winning tournament poker 1 hand at a time"
One of the guys in particular played fairly passive preflop, for example:
He's on the BB with TT, about 100bb deep, 4 callers before him and he just checks. His logic is that if he hits he can win a huge pot but if he doesn't he loses pretty much nothing.
He takes the passive option for a lot of other spots rather than attacking the limpers too.
Do you prefer taking these lines? I did it for a while but now I think I prefer attacking the limpers and trying to isolate.
Could it be because he's playing $50+ BI and I'm playing mostly micros?
Cos the aggressive lines seem to work better the lower stakes cos you get value from so many more hands