This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL2 22 flop set, too passive?

    • member001
      Joined: 18.03.2010 Posts: 288
      Known players:

      0.01/0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant.Base 0.99 by

      Preflop: Hero is SB with 2:heart: , 2:spade:
      2 folds, CO calls $0.02, BU folds, Hero calls $0.01, BB raises to $0.04, CO calls $0.02, Hero calls $0.02.

      Flop: ($0.12) 7:diamond: , 4:club: , 2:diamond: (3 players)
      Hero checks, BB bets $0.12, CO folds, Hero raises to $0.30, BB calls $0.18.

      Turn: ($0.72) 8:spade: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BB bets $0.3, Hero calls $0.30.

      River: ($1.32) T:diamond: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BB checks.

      Final Pot: $1.32

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      Hero shows three-of-a-kind, deuces (2h 2s)
      BB shows (As Ks)

      Hero wins with three-of-a-kind, deuces (2h 2s)

      Did I play this too passively? In a multiway limped pot (well ok, not technically limped, but the minraise preflop hardly counts) for some reason I was a bit scared of getting coolered set over set after villain bet/called the flop.
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello member001,

      First of all, I'd even raise bigger on flop ~$0,40. And otherwise why are you Checking the turn? I'd just Bet myself and try to get it in by river. You are basically giving away free cards while he could easily be even drawing or even having some overpair which wants to go broke.

      Best regards.