This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL10, KQ vs river raze

    • cowii
      Joined: 27.03.2010 Posts: 126
      IPoker Network $10.00 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players - View hand 1331190
      DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

      BB: $10.00
      UTG: $5.22
      Hero (MP): $18.47
      CO: $4.46
      BTN: $14.04
      SB: $4.34

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is MP with Q :club: K :club:
      1 fold, Hero raises to $0.30, CO calls $0.30, BTN calls $0.30, 2 folds

      Flop: ($1.05) T :heart: 4 :club: 6 :club: (3 players)
      Hero checks, CO checks, BTN bets $0.78, Hero calls $0.78, CO folds

      Turn: ($2.61) Q :diamond: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN checks

      River: ($2.61) K :spade: (2 players)
      Hero bets $1.30, BTN raises to $4.88, Hero ???

      Villan 28/8

      Turn - was planing to ch/r (sholud have razed on flop now i think) (probably donk would be better), but anyway, is the river call ?
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello cowii,

      Flop: I'd actually just CBet myself on flop while having overcards+FD. Unless you really thought there are aggressive opponents who might take stabs on you.

      As played
      Turn: Nah, I wouldn't really Check/Raise here, you basically just isolating yourself against better hands. He wont continue with any worse and might easily even have sets or something similar. Therefore if you went for a check then it's a Check/Call.
      River: That's pretty sick. His raise ain't that small either. We need like 30% equity to make it profitable. And for example against something like this:

      Board: T:heart: 4:club: 6:club:  Q:diamond:  K:spade:
             Equity     Win     Tie
      UTG    62.50%  62.50%   0.00% { TT, 66, 44, KTs, AcJc, KTo }
      UTG+1  37.50%  37.50%   0.00% { KcQc }

      You even getting the range. Although it depends of course what kind of range you are putting him on. And how passive he has been. If he really has been rather more passive side and not really raising that aggressively with 2pairs. Then I might even prefer folding be better. For example could take into account his WTSD/W$SD and etc.

      And of course we might even add few hands into his range like K6s/K4s, but just took a bit tighter range.

      Best regards.