[NL20-NL50] Bluff or not?

    • BrinkyBill
      Joined: 22.12.2010 Posts: 186
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.25(BB) Poker Stars
      SB ($19.35)
      BB ($21.59)
      UTG ($54.81)
      UTG+1 ($21.08)
      CO ($25.50)
      Hero ($40.19)

      Dealt to Hero A:spade: A:club:

      fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.75, SB calls $0.65, BB calls $0.50

      FLOP ($2.25) 6:diamond: 4:heart: 5:club:

      SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $1.75, SB calls $1.75, BB calls $1.75

      TURN ($7.50) 6:diamond: 4:heart: 5:club: K:club:

      SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $3.50, SB folds, BB calls $3.50

      RIVER ($14.50) 6:diamond: 4:heart: 5:club: K:club: 3:diamond:

      BB bets $15.59 (AI), Hero folds

      BB wins $13.80
  • 3 replies
    • Beseventh
      Joined: 06.01.2010 Posts: 2,519
      U can't really call it w/o Solid reads on villain. He called 2 streets and lead/shove river. might be a bluff but is it really worth it to call it ? You'll make worste mistake by calling it then him bluffing. WP Ev +
    • DoigteurFou
      Joined: 16.08.2007 Posts: 1,529
      Bet much larger on the turn for protection. 6$ is correct imo, I'd like 6.5$ :)
      There are so much draws in there you have to make them pay.

      As for the river, I think you can fold. A set could slowplay that way, as well as hands like 76 or 77, and sometimes 43 will be here as well.

      If it is a bluff, then it's well played by your opponent because you can't catch it w/ TPTK or overpair. You could have limited this by betting bigger on the turn, letting him less fold equity on the river (and so bluffs will be less likely).

      At least this is my opinion about it, I can be wrong here, those laydowns are allways strange spots for neophytes like us :D
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      he is not bluffing there, so it should be fold. Consider how drawy is board I´d prefer betting turn 6$