Elephant bug?

    • patszerdonk
      patszerdonk
      Bronze
      Joined: 19.05.2011 Posts: 834
      I guess this is an Elephant bug. How could CO raises on the turn?

      Known players:
      Position:
      Stack
      Hero:
      $4.73
      CO:
      $1.16
      BU:
      $3.18

      0.01/0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.102 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is BB with 3:heart: , 3:spade:
      MP3 folds, CO calls $0.02, BU calls $0.02, SB folds, Hero raises to $0.06, CO calls $0.04, BU calls $0.04.

      Flop: ($0.19) K:club: , 9:club: , 3:diamond: (3 players)
      Hero checks, CO bets $0.09, BU calls $0.09, Hero raises to $0.41, CO calls $0.32, BU folds.

      Turn: ($1.10) 8:diamond: (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.82, CO raises to $0.69 (All-In).

      River: ($2.61) 9:heart: (2 players)


      Final Pot: $2.61

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      CO shows (Ks 7d)
      Hero shows a full-house, threes full of nines (3h 3s)

      Hero wins with a full-house, threes full of nines (3h 3s)
  • 4 replies
    • mrk1988
      mrk1988
      Bronze
      Joined: 04.02.2007 Posts: 13,337
      Hey patszerdonk,

      please post the original handhistory! You can anonymize it of course.
    • patszerdonk
      patszerdonk
      Bronze
      Joined: 19.05.2011 Posts: 834
      How to find the original HH? I'm playing at WH.
    • Larres
      Larres
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.09.2009 Posts: 2,402
      Hi there,

      I guess your point here is the wording as "CO raises" should better be "CO calls"?
      IPoker (e.g. William Hill) defines an all-in action always as a raise action and there is nothing much we can do about it as we're only parsing the hand history.
      However the outcome has to be correct, is it?

      Cheers,
      L

      PS: The path is ...William Hill Poker/History/<Your Screenname>\Table
    • patszerdonk
      patszerdonk
      Bronze
      Joined: 19.05.2011 Posts: 834
      Originally posted by Larres
      Hi there,

      I guess your point here is the wording as "CO raises" should better be "CO calls"?
      IPoker (e.g. William Hill) defines an all-in action always as a raise action and there is nothing much we can do about it as we're only parsing the hand history.
      However the outcome has to be correct, is it?

      Cheers,
      L

      PS: The path is ...William Hill Poker/History/<Your Screenname>\Table

      Ah, I see. So it is not Elephant's problem at all. Not a big problem actually. Thanks for clarification.