[NL2-NL10] NL2 FR - AKs 3bet allin

    • Kaidz
      Joined: 30.06.2011 Posts: 161
      Known players:

      0,01/0,02 No-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.102 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is BB with A:spade: , K:spade:
      UTG2 folds, MP1 raises to $0,08, 5 folds, Hero raises to $0,28, MP1 raises to $0,62, Hero raises to $2,17 (All-In), MP1 calls $1,55.

      Flop: ($4,35) J:heart: , J:club: , 7:heart:
      Turn: ($4,35) 2:spade:
      River: ($4,35) 3:club: (2 players)

      Final Pot: $4,35

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      MP1 shows two-pair, queens and jacks (Qd Qc)
      Hero shows (As Ks)

      MP1 wins with two-pair, queens and jacks (Qd Qc)
  • 2 replies
    • giliNL
      Joined: 13.07.2011 Posts: 56
      AKs all-in is almost a coinflip against a normal open raiser from MP, about 58% equity.

      Against a pure 3bet range (TT+, AQs+,AKo+, and he's prob not 4betting with less than that) you're even a little behind with 45% equity.

      Personally I prefer to bet and call or 3bet and call with AK. Then you can re-evaluate on the flop.
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Kaidz,

      The problem with the 3bet is that we don't even have a lot of stats on the opponent. So basically we are taking him as unknown. As you 3bet then basically it means you are doing it for value. But rather the question is maybe it's better to just Call and reevaluate it postflop while it could be the spot that you get just a flip and that's all.

      Best regards.