[NL2-NL10] NL10 FR 54s 17.08

    • UnknownJoseph
      UnknownJoseph
      Bronze
      Joined: 22.04.2010 Posts: 5,735
      - $0.10 NL - Holdem - 9 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      MP: $15.19 (~200)15/12/91(CBF)/33(CBT)
      MP+1: $1.95
      Hero (LP): $11.68
      CO: $10.84
      BTN: $10.26
      SB: $2.72
      BB: $2.00
      UTG: $10.00
      UTG+1: $9.34

      SB posts SB $0.05, BB posts BB $0.10

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero has 4:heart: 5:heart:

      UTG calls $0.10, fold, MP raises to $0.45, fold, Hero calls $0.45, fold, fold, fold, fold, fold

      Flop: ($1.15, 2 players) 2:spade: 4:spade: 6:diamond:
      MP bets $0.86, Hero calls $0.86

      Turn: ($2.87, 2 players) Q:heart:
      MP bets $2.15, fold

      Here I wanted to float... what do u think about it?
  • 3 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello BGawli,

      Preflop: With those hands rather fold it. They ain't the best to play. Low SCs usually are rather pain in the a** then winning hand. :D

      As played
      Postflop: Depending on the player one option might sometimes be even to raise it on flop and maybe even gain some fold equity vs him and his overpairs and maybe even some basic CBet range. But practically picking the passive line is fine a well but we very often have to consider folding it on turn as you did.

      Best regards.
    • UnknownJoseph
      UnknownJoseph
      Bronze
      Joined: 22.04.2010 Posts: 5,735
      so 45s isn't good enough to play... what about 56s and 67s?
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by BGawli
      so 45s isn't good enough to play... what about 56s and 67s?
      Rather more higher SCs than smaller ones which don't even have the possibility to hit a TP. Start with higher ones first and then look how you doing with them and then adjust to that.