[NL20-NL50] nl50 SH - A6s Blind Battle

    • Maniatrix
      Joined: 01.11.2008 Posts: 658
      PokerStars - $0.50 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      BTN: $98.05
      SB: $102.95 22/17/ATS:36/Foldv3bet:38/AF:2.4/WTSD:25/W$SD:60
      Hero (BB): $50.00 20/17/BBfvs:73/3bet:9/AF:3.6
      UTG: $61.50
      CO: $245.85

      SB posts SB $0.25, Hero posts BB $0.50, BTN posts ante $0.10, SB posts ante $0.10, Hero posts ante $0.10, UTG posts ante $0.10, CO posts ante $0.10

      Pre Flop: ($1.25) Hero has A:diamond: 6:diamond:

      fold, fold, fold, SB raises to $1.50, Hero raises to $4.50, SB calls $3.00

      Flop: ($9.50, 2 players) 6:spade: 6:heart: 2:diamond:
      SB checks, Hero bets $5.00, fold

      Hero wins $9.05

      I can expect him to go broke with JJ+ right, so betting here is better than checking behind for bluff induce?
  • 3 replies
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      this flop is so dry, that you really rather make bet that would induce bluffraise that board, so I would bet there 3-4$, then half pot on the turn and shove on the river.
      Also prefer continuing my aggression on the flop, where I´d c-bet 100% of my 3-bet range
    • BigOVERBET
      Joined: 23.11.2010 Posts: 433
      youre playing agressive...correct bet on the flop...if you check behind, it looks suspicious and you can giving him a free card, not talking about not building pot....
      Villain expects you to bet there, cause you reraise preflop....then you should bet...and hope he will level himself with air and raise there or go broke with 99+
    • Maniatrix
      Joined: 01.11.2008 Posts: 658
      You're right betting is prob best here.