[NL2-NL10] nl10 fr AK

    • tofu22
      tofu22
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.10.2008 Posts: 659
      Pacific Poker - $0.10 NL - Holdem - 7 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      UTG+1: $10.49
      MP: $10.30
      CO: $4.95
      BTN: $10.00
      Hero (SB): $10.13
      BB: $4.83
      UTG: $12.77

      Hero posts SB $0.05, BB posts BB $0.10

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero has A:club: K:diamond:

      fold, fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.40, BB raises to $0.70, Hero raises to $10.13, BB calls $4.13

      Flop: ($9.66, 2 players) 5:heart: 8:diamond: K:heart:

      Turn: ($9.66, 2 players) 6:diamond:

      River: ($9.66, 2 players) T:spade:


      no stats

      would calling maybe be better?
  • 3 replies
    • Wriggers
      Wriggers
      Bronze
      Joined: 21.07.2009 Posts: 3,250
      I think this is completely fine BvB even in FR. Calling is completely out of the question since we're OOP and calling 3bets OOP should never be our preferred move (This changes if we know our villains bet a polarised range, but even then I wouldn't flat AKo OOP, i'd just be tempted to flat premiums).

      Since he's only half stacked as well your 4bet shove is fine, although if he was fullstacked would you have chosen a different sizing for your 4bet?
    • tofu22
      tofu22
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.10.2008 Posts: 659
      Originally posted by Wriggers
      BvB

      Since he's only half stacked as well your 4bet shove is fine, although if he was fullstacked would you have chosen a different sizing for your 4bet?

      what's this?

      since i'm such a tight nit with AK i prob would have folded to a full stacked opp.
    • Wriggers
      Wriggers
      Bronze
      Joined: 21.07.2009 Posts: 3,250
      It means Blind vs Blind. Because obviously ranges are wider when you get 3bet by BB after opening SB than if you were 3bet by UTG_1 after opening UTG :)