Originally posted by numbersguy
Originally posted by Kruppe
LOL, those are 4 of the best regs, i know them well, why the f would they be bots? (seriously, if you're an NL50 FR reg and not on that list, you're probably worse than them)
In my database, Liam1215, Lu10ant, and toby_911 are all actually losing players (and mike2953's winrate is only 2.32 bb/100 over 15k hands). Perhaps they only all do really well when you're at the table?
are you guys teaming together to try to get your best opponents removed?
In the 2 months I've played NL50 FR Dadaist and Toby are my 1st and 3rd biggest donators.
edit: been looking at them in HEM. there's definitely some suspicious similarities, but i suspect that if anything, it's multi-accounting (in which case probably not collusion, as they seem to have not played much with eachother)
If they've played with eachother at all (which they DO do actually a lot) then it's not multi-accounting.
i don't believe anyone has programmed bots that advanced yet.
It's almost common knowledge now that bots are crushing stakes as high as 5 / 10.
2nd edit: sorry, was wrong about liam, just remembered i've been playing him at SH. he's not a FR reg, he's an overly steal/3bet happy SH reg. no idea why you'd include him in the list...?
If he plays SH, then it's logically impossible that he also plays FR...
You actually came back to re-edit your post with this nonsense?
my edit excluded liam from the players i was saying were good, and i have no idea about lu10ant.
if toby and dadaist are your biggest donators, that's either variance or you figured out that they are bots and then how to exploit them...?
they don't play together a lot from what i can see. and multi-accounts can of course play with eachother, especially if they are colluding(you've heard of multi-accing by players like Sorel Mizzi in MTTs, right?).
'It's almost common knowledge now that bots are crushing stakes as high as 5 / 10.'
that sounds totally retarded. where have you got this 'almost' knowledge from? this somewhat reduces your credibiliy. who is programming these bots? some NL5k crusher? or nanonoko maybe?
about liam: wow @ calling my edit nonsense. it wasn't nonsense. i edit instead of double posting. i'm a reg and i remembered that i've played liam at SH, not FR, and that he was completely different in play-style to toby/dada/konigl. i checked HEM to confirm.
and i hadn't actually written anything about lliam explicitly that i then deleted. i was referring to my implicit mention of liam when saying that the players that were listed in OP were some of the best regs. in fact, that implicit mention is still in my post.
