[NL2-NL10] NL10 Aces

    • kinkink220
      Joined: 26.10.2009 Posts: 64
      Villain is a good reg 22/17/3.0ag/ for 500 hands, the other caller is 17/10 for 40 hands.

      Merge, $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players

      BTN: $10 (100 bb)
      SB: $9.90 (99 bb)
      BB: $12.93 (129.3 bb)
      Hero (UTG): $18.01 (180.1 bb)
      MP: $10.89 (108.9 bb)
      CO: $10.69 (106.9 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is UTG with A A
      Hero raises to $0.35, MP calls $0.35, 2 folds, SB calls $0.30, BB folds

      Flop: ($1.15) 4 9 8 (3 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $0.86, MP folds, SB raises to $3.29, Hero calls $2.43

      Turn: ($7.73) 7 (2 players)
      SB bets $6.26 and is all-in, Hero folds

      Results: $7.73 pot ($0.38 rake)

      Final Board:4 9 8 7
      SB mucked and won $7.35 ($3.71 net)
      Hero mucked A A and lost (-$3.64 net)

      Have a note against main villain, previously lost overpair against hit set by calling his turn bet 70bb potsize, kinda the same situation as this one. He is 10 or 12 tabling so I assume he has the same approach with sets in similar situations.
  • 2 replies
    • itblue145
      Joined: 07.11.2011 Posts: 20
      imo villain could have set (44) there...the thing is I don't see calling on the flop the best option, probably a shove would be better cuz`the turn would obviously not help u...and by doing a shove u get some equity....again thats just my 2 cents
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello kinkink220,

      I don't really like the Call on the flop. I mean why do you Call the flop and then fold the river? Only something like JT completed. I'd most likely either ship the flop or just fold directly. There are way too many cards which we don't want to see on the turn. Most likely myself I'd just Bet/Fold it without any specific reads.

      Best Regards.