[NL2-NL10] nl5 - QQ

    • Philfox1985
      Philfox1985
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.12.2010 Posts: 934
      Anything to change here?

      Known players:
      Position:
      Stack
      BB:
      $8.29
      Hero:
      $5.86
      BU:
      $4.25

      0.03/0.05 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.105 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is CO with Q:spade: , Q:club:
      MP3 folds, Hero raises to $0.18, BU calls $0.18, SB folds, BB calls $0.13.

      Flop: ($0.57) 6:spade: , 5:spade: , 2:diamond: (3 players)
      BB bets $0.05, Hero raises to $0.40, BU calls $0.40, BB calls $0.35.

      Turn: ($1.77) 9:heart: (3 players)
      BB bets $0.05, Hero raises to $1.03, BU calls $1.03, BB calls $0.98.

      River: ($4.86) 4:club: (3 players)
      BB checks, Hero checks, BU checks.

      Final Pot: $4.86

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      Hero shows (Qs Qc)
      BU shows two-pair, sixes and fours (6d 4s)
      BB shows (Ts Td)

      BU wins with two-pair, sixes and fours (6d 4s)
  • 3 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Philfox1985,

      Against such a small donk I don't mind your play at all. If the Bet size would be bigger then most likely I'd pick pot control line.

      Best Regards.
    • Philfox1985
      Philfox1985
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.12.2010 Posts: 934
      Why take a pot control line against loose passive opponents ie. opponents who will happily call with worse?
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by Philfox1985
      Why take a pot control line against loose passive opponents ie. opponents who will happily call with worse?
      Actually somehow I missed the Bet size on the flop of the opponent, so for that given reason isn't even wrong. Somehow I saw it yesterday $0,50. :D Damn drinking. :f_cry: