# [NL2-NL10] All-in as C-bet

• Bronze
Joined: 08.05.2011
Is it correct to go all-in as a c-bet, when all-in means 2/3's the pot?

I think the MSS article says this is correct against exactly one opponent. I was against two, so I guess I was wrong for this reason?

Would it have been the correct move if there was only one opponet?

I guess all the action before the flop shows that they have something they don't want to fold, even to c-bet? So, does this mean it is a bad call, or is it justified with pot odds and a back door flush draw with two overcards?

Here is the hand:

Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

Play hand

\$0.02/\$0.05 No-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)

Known players:
SB:
\$7.65
BB (Hero):
\$1.60
UTG2:
\$1.56
MP1:
\$6.01
MP2:
\$5.01
MP3:
\$4.20
CO:
\$7.53
BU:
\$5.10

Preflop: Hero is BB with K, A.
2 folds, MP2 raises to \$0.15, MP3 calls \$0.15, 3 folds, Hero raises to \$0.45, MP2 calls \$0.30, MP3 calls \$0.30.

Flop: (\$1.37) T, 9, 5 (3 players)
Hero bets \$1.15, MP2 calls \$1.15, MP3 calls \$1.15.

Turn: (\$4.82) 3 (2 players)
MP2 bets \$3.41, MP3 calls \$2.60(All-In).

River: (\$10.83) 6 (3 players)

Final Pot: \$10.83.

Results follow
:MP2 shows a pair of queens(Q Q).Hero shows high card ace(K A).MP3 shows three of a kind, threes(3 3).MP3 wins with three of a kind, threes(3 3).