This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL SH 56s

    • staktas
      Joined: 28.03.2011 Posts: 1,346
      Known players:

      0.01/0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant 0.106 by

      Preflop: Hero is BU with 6:spade: , 5:spade:
      2 folds, CO calls $0.02, Hero raises to $0.10, 2 folds, CO calls $0.08.

      Flop: ($0.23) J:spade: , 8:club: , 2:spade: (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero bets $0.16, CO calls $0.16.

      Turn: ($0.55) 9:diamond: (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero checks.

      River: ($0.55) T:club: (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero checks.

      Final Pot: $0.55

      Could I try to semi-bluff again on the turn with my combo-draw?
  • 1 reply
    • luizsilveira
      Joined: 27.11.2010 Posts: 2,320
      Hi, staktas.

      Against an unknown who looks a bit loose I might as well just get the free card and control the pot.

      You do have a combo draw but it's a super weak one (villain might be calling with a hand that dominates you, like a higher spade draw [edit] or a higher straight, be wary of overplaying the low end of the straight [/edit]).

      *IF* you bet the turn I think you must go ahead and bet again on the river most of the time - and 3 barrelling against a loose unknown is a recipe for disaster.

      As played it gets interesting on the river... while we have no showdown value and might be tempted to bluff on a very dangerous board, most of villain's range will have at least a pair now and I don't think they would fold to easily scared by a potential Q. As a matter of fact, I think if your opponent had nothing he would have bet the river himself since your range might have quite a bit of trash.

      Thus as I see it giving up is fine, nice hand.