[NL2-NL10] 44 NL2 vs loose& agressive but not lag.

    • ilovemagic
      Joined: 09.09.2011 Posts: 1,019
      such a hateful river. i put him on a flush draw...but i should still play for stacks on river....dumb dumb check in my opinion...........................
      i read him as a bad player so set should win if he has king or ace. im getting tired and this is a sign i need to stop and go to bed lol...goodnight

      Known players:

      0.01/0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.106 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is BU with 4:diamond: , 4:club:
      UTG2 raises to $0.04, 4 folds, Hero calls $0.04, 2 folds.

      Flop: ($0.11) 6:club: , 4:heart: , 3:spade: (2 players)
      UTG2 checks, Hero checks.

      Turn: ($0.11) K:spade: (2 players)
      UTG2 checks, Hero bets $0.13, UTG2 raises to $0.26, Hero raises to $0.70, UTG2 calls $0.44.

      River: ($1.51) A:spade: (2 players)
      UTG2 checks, Hero checks.

      Final Pot: $1.51

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      UTG2 shows (Kc Jc)
      Hero shows three-of-a-kind, fours (4d 4c)

      Hero wins with three-of-a-kind, fours (4d 4c)
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343

      personally would bet/bet/shove postflop with my set, but as played I think you should put him all-in on the river. he has 0.94$ left and I doubt he has there AA or KK, but he may easily call you down with Kx or Ax and he shouldn´t always have there flushdraw (also I think a lot of players would shove river if they hit their flush)

      Also I don´t see reason why you shoudl check flop and overbet turn. Making it 0.8$ seems more logical to me.

      Best regards,