What sites have are good for HUSNGs besides Stars?

    • suaveplayer
      suaveplayer
      Bronze
      Joined: 08.08.2009 Posts: 109
      Hello everyone.

      What sites are good for HUSNGs other than Poker Stars (already play there)?


      I mean, which ones have decent action and preferably decent rake.

      Just played two matches at PartyPoker and the rake is horrendous. Like 10% or something.
  • 9 replies
    • fruktpuff
      fruktpuff
      Bronze
      Joined: 24.09.2010 Posts: 3,982
      May I suggest dropping a line in this thread:

      Choosing the right Poker Room for you!

      Including format, level, seat amount(well, HUsng, as you said), volume, and any other relevant information?

      The people caring for that thread have great knowledge about most rooms and would surely be able to advice you!

      Regards,
      Richard
    • IngridN
      IngridN
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.03.2011 Posts: 12,162
      Hi suaveplayer,

      10% is everywhere. Anything below like $50 and 10% rake is the standard. Microgaming and ongame are decent traffic wise but microgaming might have has less traffic but better rakeback.

      Ingrid
    • matel17
      matel17
      Bronze
      Joined: 11.07.2010 Posts: 1,278
      Yeah 10% is standard probably everywhere. In some sites when you go really low in stakes, like $1.20 the rake is 20%.
    • Th0m4sBC
      Th0m4sBC
      Bronze
      Joined: 01.06.2006 Posts: 7,550
      Originally posted by IngridN
      Hi suaveplayer,

      10% is everywhere. Anything below like $50 and 10% rake is the standard. Microgaming and ongame are decent traffic wise but microgaming might have has less traffic but better rakeback.

      Ingrid
      What would bring you to that statement, Ingrid? 10% is no where to be 'normal' when it comes to HU SNGs. Stars takes lower rake, so does iPoker.... PartyPoker is not the whole world.
    • PAOKHAWK
      PAOKHAWK
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.09.2010 Posts: 36
      William Hill has lower than 10% (for example 0.05 at 1$ HU and 0.10 at 2$,etc)
    • stajv
      stajv
      Bronze
      Joined: 09.01.2011 Posts: 1,085
      Yea ipoker has 5% rake and is pretty good to play at if you play low stakes.. don't know about the traffic at the stakes above 30s tho
    • wasy8
      wasy8
      Black
      Joined: 29.01.2009 Posts: 1,507
      Originally posted by IngridN
      Hi suaveplayer,

      10% is everywhere. Anything below like $50 and 10% rake is the standard. Microgaming and ongame are decent traffic wise but microgaming might have has less traffic but better rakeback.

      Ingrid
      10% rake is NOT the standard. standard is more like 5%. party rake is ridiculous and the network with the second highest rake is ongame at 8%

      ipoker, everest, 888 are all more in the neighborhood of 5%.
    • stajv
      stajv
      Bronze
      Joined: 09.01.2011 Posts: 1,085
      Originally posted by wasy8
      Originally posted by IngridN
      Hi suaveplayer,

      10% is everywhere. Anything below like $50 and 10% rake is the standard. Microgaming and ongame are decent traffic wise but microgaming might have has less traffic but better rakeback.

      Ingrid
      10% rake is NOT the standard. standard is more like 5%. party rake is ridiculous and the network with the second highest rake is ongame at 8%

      ipoker, everest, 888 are all more in the neighborhood of 5%.

      +1 10% rake games aren't even worth playing imo unless you have like 60% rb
    • ragney
      ragney
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.08.2010 Posts: 2,417
      nvm i read wrong