This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] playing a set again

    • gg12gg
      Joined: 30.06.2010 Posts: 20

      Yesterday veriz helped me with playing a set on a heavy board. Now it is a bit different situation: I am not a preflop aggressor and I'm out of position.

      Known players:

      0.05/0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (4 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant 0.105 by

      Preflop: Hero is BB with 2:heart: , 2:club:
      CO raises to $0.20, BU calls $0.20, SB folds, Hero calls $0.10.

      Both of my opponents are rather loose. CO is a fish who can call 2-3 streets with a second pair.

      Flop: ($0.65) K:heart: , 5:spade: , 2:spade: (3 players)
      Hero checks, CO checks, BU bets $0.44, Hero calls $0.44, CO calls $0.44.

      I though that I should wait for preflop aggressor to c-bet, so I checked. Should I bet here instead of checking? May be check/raise would be better?

      Turn: ($1.97) 4:heart: (3 players)
      Hero checks, CO checks, BU bets $1.38, Hero raises to $4.00, CO folds, BU calls $2.62.

      BU bet the flop, and I though he would bet again here, because nothing changed, so I play check/raise.

      River: ($9.97) 7:spade: (2 players)
      Hero raises $7.02 (All-In), BU calls $6.25 (All-In).

      BU didn't check the turn so he unlikely has a flush, I move all-in.

      Final Pot: $23.24

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      BU shows (Ks Qh)
      Hero shows three-of-a-kind, deuces (2h 2c)

      Hero wins with three-of-a-kind, deuces (2h 2c)
  • 2 replies