[NL2-NL10] AKo 19.02.

    • HansTheGreat
      HansTheGreat
      Bronze
      Joined: 14.02.2010 Posts: 3,807
      BB: $17.04 - VPIP: 31, PFR: 12, 3B: 5, AF: 1.8, Hands: 1564
      UTG: $10.00 - VPIP: 11, PFR: 6, 3B: 2, AF: 1.5, Hands: 494
      UTG+1: $3.62 - VPIP: 61, PFR: 3, 3B: 13, AF: 0.6, Hands: 36
      Hero (MP1): $10.00 - VPIP: 16, PFR: 12, 3B: 4, AF: 3.9, Hands: 25981
      MP2: $19.01 - VPIP: 48, PFR: 20, 3B: 0, AF: 1.4, Hands: 66
      CO: $10.21 - VPIP: 30, PFR: 10, 3B: 4, AF: 2.6, Hands: 403
      BTN: $2.59 - VPIP: 13, PFR: 0, 3B: 0, AF: 0.0, Hands: 16
      SB: $7.43 - VPIP: 29, PFR: 13, 3B: 0, AF: 0.8, Hands: 24

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is MP1 with A :spade: K :diamond:
      1 fold, UTG+1 calls $0.10, Hero raises to $0.50, 4 folds, BB calls $0.40, UTG+1 calls $0.40

      Flop: ($1.55) J :spade: Q :spade: 2 :spade: (3 players)
      BB bets $1.11, UTG+1 folds, Hero calls $1.11

      Turn: ($3.77) 6 :diamond: (2 players)
      BB bets $2.69, Hero folds



      How to approach this. I mean with my call on the flop I basically hoping to get the implied on the turn? But in most cases I wont so what to do?
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Sikac,

      Well, the problem there is that most likely you wont have that great implied odds cause of 4card flush then. :( But rather our overall equity against more realistic and looser range should be fine. For that given reason taking passive approach should be fine.

      Best Regards.