This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL16 SH - AKo deep vs LAG

    • numbnutter
      Joined: 21.09.2011 Posts: 139
      Poker Stars, $0.08/$0.16 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 5 Players
      Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

      BB: $11.63 (72.7 bb)
      MP: $16 (100 bb)
      CO: $33.68 (210.5 bb)
      BTN: $15.36 (96 bb)
      Hero (SB): $22.25 (139.1 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is SB with A K
      MP folds, CO raises to $0.48, BTN folds, Hero raises to $1.76, BB folds, CO calls $1.28

      Flop: ($3.68) 6 A 5 (2 players)
      Hero bets $2.56, CO calls $2.56

      Turn: ($8.80) 4 (2 players)
      Hero bets $4.64, CO calls $4.64

      River: ($18.08) 4 (2 players)
      Hero bets $5.44, CO raises to $24.72 and is all-in, Hero calls $7.85 and is all-in

      Results: $44.66 pot ($1.50 rake)
      Final Board: 6 A 5 4 4
      CO showed 4 7 and won $43.16 ($20.91 net)
      Hero showed A K and lost (-$22.25 net)

      Villain is a pretty aggressive LAG: 39/36 14.8% 3bet, 25% fto3bet over 103 hands, 60% steal range from the CO.

      Since we're deep and he plays pretty loose I give him a super wide range for calling our 3bet here, something like:

             Equity     Win     Tie
      MP2    60.60%  58.64%   1.96% { AdKs }
      MP3    39.40%  37.44%   1.96% { QQ-22, A2s+, K9s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T8s+, 96s+, 85s+, 75s+, 64s+, 54s, AJo+, KJo+, QTo+, J9o+, T9o, 98o, 87o }

      Which is roughly a 25% range.

      The flop comes 6 :club: A :club: 5 :club:
      Not the greatest board since we have no club, but we make TPTK so this is a definite cbet for value and protection. We're still doing pretty good against his total range anyway:

      Board: A:club: 6:club: 5:club:
             Equity     Win     Tie
      MP2    69.53%  67.05%   2.48% { AdKs }
      MP3    30.47%  27.99%   2.48% { QQ-22, A2s+, K9s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T8s+, 96s+, 85s+, 74s+, 64s+, 54s, AJo+, KJo+, QTo+, J9o+, T9o, 98o, 87o }

      Villain calls, which in my mind puts him on one of three hand ranges:

      1. A non-nut drawing hand: straight draws & weak flush draws
      2. A weakish made hand: top pair, two pair etc
      3. The complete nuts: K :club: x :club:

      I think he would raise the following ranges:

      1. Sets
      2. Nut flush draws
      3. Weaker made flushes

      and fold everything else. So I give him a new range that looks like the following:

      Board: A:club: 6:club: 5:club:
             Equity     Win     Tie
      MP2    55.85%  51.11%   4.74% { AdKs }
      MP3    44.15%  39.41%   4.74% { AQs-ATs, A6s-A5s, KcQc, KcJc, KcTc, Kc9c, 8d7d, 8h7h, 8s7s, 6d5d, 6h5h, 6s5s, 7d4d, 7h4h, 7s4s, AQo-AJo, 87o, AdKh, AdKs, AhKd, AhKs, AsKd, AsKh }

      Turn comes 4 :spade: , more or less a blank but it does complete a draw. We fire again and yet again villain just calls. It's pretty clear that the 4 didn't really change his relative hand strength, so i think we can now remove 78 from his range:

      Board: A:club: 6:club: 5:club:  4:spade:
             Equity     Win     Tie
      MP2    58.29%  53.88%   4.41% { AdKs }
      MP3    41.71%  37.30%   4.41% { AQs-ATs, A6s-A5s, KcQc, KcJc, KcTc, Kc9c, 6d5d, 6h5h, 6s5s, 7d4d, 7h4h, 7s4s, AQo-AJo, AdKh, AdKs, AhKd, AhKs, AsKd, AsKh }

      River comes 4 :diamond: , pretty much a total blank at this point. Also if he had two pair we just counterfeited it. So now we're doing pretty good against his range:

      Board: A:club: 6:club: 5:club:  4:spade:  4:diamond:
             Equity     Win     Tie
      MP2    67.14%  60.00%   7.14% { AdKs }
      MP3    32.86%  25.71%   7.14% { AQs-ATs, A6s-A5s, KcQc, KcJc, KcTc, Kc9c, 6d5d, 6h5h, 6s5s, 7d4d, 7h4h, 7s4s, AJo+ }

      Equilab puts his hand strength distributions as:

      4 combos: Flush
      1 combo: Three of a kind
      21 combos: Two pair (we beat)
      3 combos: Two pair (we tie)
      4 combos: Two pair (we lose)

      My plan for the river is to bet small to induce calls from weaker two pairs, and induce raises from his bluffs (so bet/call here for me). When he shoves over we have to call $7.85 to win a pot of $36.81, so we only have to be good 17.5% of the time. Given that only 9/31 of his combos actually beat us (29%) we can infer that (5*17.5/82.5) he only needs to bluff with 3-4 combos to make this profitable, or (3.5/31) he only needs to be bluffing with 11% of his range.

      Are my range estimations okay here? Would a different line be more appropriate on the river? (bet/fold, shove, check/fold?).

      Apologies for how long this was Veriz! Thought it was a pretty interesting hand though and deserved a bit of analysis.

      EDIT: Forgot some 2 pair combos that beat us (edited this). Also I realised I removed all the weak flush draws from his range so we may actually be stronger than this on the river.
  • 2 replies
    • luizsilveira
      Joined: 27.11.2010 Posts: 2,320
      Hi, numbnutter.

      Since you addressed Veriz specifically I'll flag this hand to him, but I'll post my evaluation as well if that's ok.

      Preflop: (damn, this NL16 screwed my preflop math.... anyway) you can 3bet bigger for value since we're deep. 3,5x out of position against a lag is way too inviting for him to flat. You probably won't bluff this guy - especially preflop) anyway so no need to balance.

      Considering his range is wide I don't think there is much for us to do but to bet/bet/bet indeed. He might call with many AQ/AJ, especially with a :club: ; on top of that, he will probably float us a lot anyway (a guy like that does not call pre to fold flop), and we don't want to check turn and give a free card.

      However, I'd bet bigger on the turn, like at least $5.1, and get an easy shove on the river. Yes, we could once in a blue moon try to induce something but we don't want him to call a cheap river with AQ/AJ, or to just check behind his TT with T :club: hoping you were spazzing out or knowing he's beat. Against him I'm playing easy and just betting big 3 streets for value.
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello numbnutter,

      Wouldn't go even into detailed analyze about ranges here, because they are totally wrong. :P I mean no made flush? No set? That kind of guy definitely can even slowplay sets.

      But if you even want to play for the stacks then no way I am going to play this way as you did. Bet bigger on the turn and ship the river yourself, you will a lot value in long run with your play. Why do you even think he will ever shove as a bluff on river while you practically are committed? :D

      Best Regards.