[NL2-NL10] JTo 12.03.

    • HansTheGreat
      HansTheGreat
      Bronze
      Joined: 14.02.2010 Posts: 3,807
      BTN: $9.45 - VPIP: 18, PFR: 6, 3B: 3, AF: 1.4, Hands: 560
      SB: $12.10 - VPIP: 12, PFR: 11, 3B: 2, AF: 2.6, Hands: 232
      Hero (BB): $13.34 - VPIP: 16, PFR: 12, 3B: 3, AF: 4.2, Hands: 48317

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is BB with J :heart: T :spade:
      1 fold, SB raises to $0.40, Hero calls $0.30

      Flop: ($0.80) 6 :spade: 8 :club: K :diamond: (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $0.54, SB calls $0.54

      Turn: ($1.88) 9 :diamond: (2 players)
      SB bets $0.90, Hero calls $0.90

      River: ($3.68) 4 :heart: (2 players)
      SB bets $1.75, Hero folds

  • 3 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Sikac,

      The problem on the turn is that you most likely don't have that great implied odds. He might easily have a weak hand plus we of course have to discount outs here because of FD. I would rather fold the turn.

      Best Regards.
    • HansTheGreat
      HansTheGreat
      Bronze
      Joined: 14.02.2010 Posts: 3,807
      Originally posted by veriz
      Hello Sikac,

      The problem on the turn is that you most likely don't have that great implied odds. He might easily have a weak hand plus we of course have to discount outs here because of FD. I would rather fold the turn.

      Best Regards.
      We actually have the implieds(3,52$ needed for 6 clean outs) and since the pot is so big and it would be hard to put me on that hand(backdoor straight I think I could extract the necessary amount ). Do you think this are correct reasons?
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Why do you think we have the implied odds? He could just have a very weak hand there which is never paying on the river cause of the turn bet size. :)