This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] nl20 sh QQ oop

    • HitThe1Out
      HitThe1Out
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.01.2011 Posts: 5,059
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.20(BB) Replayer
      Hero ($47.46)
      BB ($20.23)
      UTG ($19.05)
      UTG+1 ($20.64)
      CO ($20.75)
      BTN ($25.30)

      Dealt to Hero Q:spade: Q:heart:

      UTG calls $0.20, UTG+1 calls $0.20, fold, fold, Hero raises to $1.20, fold, UTG calls $1, UTG+1 calls $1

      FLOP ($3.80) 2:club: 7:club: A:club:

      Hero checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks

      TURN ($3.80) 2:club: 7:club: A:club: Q:diamond:

      Hero bets $2.50, UTG folds, UTG+1 folds

      Hero shows Q:spade: Q:heart:

      Hero wins $3.61

      utg: vpip84/pfr16/af4,3/afq54/hands54
      utg+1: no hands

      Is this play std? How would the situation change if we had Q:cQx?
  • 3 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello HitThe1Out,

      I like your play here and I wouldn't play it any differently. Nice hand! You mean either we would CB with Q:cQx? Most likely I wouldn't do that but rather reevaluate further actions. You don't get called from worse.

      Best Regards.
    • HitThe1Out
      HitThe1Out
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.01.2011 Posts: 5,059
      Good to hear!

      Yes, I was wondering if we could cbet with Q but received answer to that already.

      Would we check/fold Q:cQx as well as this current hand?

      Thx :)
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by HitThe1Out
      Good to hear!

      Yes, I was wondering if we could cbet with Q but received answer to that already.

      Would we check/fold Q:cQx as well as this current hand?

      Thx :)
      Most likely unless he bets really small, we don't get the implied odds while we could also have easily reversed implied odds.