[NL2-NL10] nl10 sh or/c 87s ep

    • mawaykid
      mawaykid
      Bronze
      Joined: 28.11.2009 Posts: 2,773
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.10(BB) Replayer
      SB ($10.56) 28/16/6.7(3b)/ 80cbet
      BB ($11.48)22/19/6.7(3b)
      Hero ($14.54)
      UTG+1 ($6) 56/11/0.8
      CO ($13.33) 44/8/1.4
      BTN ($12.23) 21/17/7.6(3b)

      Dealt to Hero 7:club: 8:club:

      Hero raises to $0.30, UTG+1 calls $0.30, CO calls $0.30, fold, SB raises to $1.35, fold, Hero calls $1.05, UTG+1 calls $1.05, fold

      FLOP ($4.45) 6:heart: 5:diamond: 5:heart:

      SB bets $2.70, Hero calls $2.70, UTG+1 folds

      TURN ($9.85) 6:heart: 5:diamond: 5:heart: K:diamond:

      SB checks, Hero bets $6.55, SB folds

      Open 78s with in this table is very bad right? with the 2 fish on blinds instead of regs is a ez open right?

      And call 3b is good? I call because the future implieds odds, with my call the fish more easily join in the pot.
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello mawaykid,

      Preflop: Well, it's possible but if you going to Call the squeeze then I don't really like it. You are just donating money into the pot, of course you have loose opponents behind you. But even if you hit a draw you practically wont get the implied odds for a Call and therefore I don't like it. The pot might easily be like $5 and if he bets $3-4 do you think you could even have the implied odds on such a draw for a Call? :)

      As played
      Postflop: Well, depends a lot on his squeezing range. Do you think he is ever folding any PPs? Also he could easily be even playing AK with Check/Call and letting you just bluff with weaker PPs. :)

      Best Regards.