[NL2-NL10] Nl 10 Fr Ak

    • salflip
      salflip
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.10.2007 Posts: 606
      Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)        
      Position
      MP1

      0.05/0.10 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.9 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is MP1 with K:spade: , A:diamond:
      UTG+1 calls $0.10, UTG+2 folds, Hero raises to $0.40, 4 folds, SB calls $0.35, BB folds, UTG+1 calls $0.30.

      Flop: ($1.30) 3:diamond: , 4:heart: , 2:heart: (3 players)
      SB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $1, SB calls $1.00, UTG+1 folds.

      Turn: ($3.30) T:spade: (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero checks.

      River: ($3.30) 8:diamond: (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $2, SB calls $2.00.

      Final Pot: $7.30

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      SB shows [ 7c, 7s ] a pair of Sevens
      Hero shows [ Ks, Ad ] high card Ace
      SB wins $6.94 USD with a pair of Sevens.
  • 2 replies
    • theloniousbones
      theloniousbones
      Bronze
      Joined: 30.01.2008 Posts: 177
      There's two ways to play this as I see it.

      1- Bet ~$3.00+ on turn, fold to a r/r and check behind river if he calls turnbet.

      2- Check behind turn (as played), check behind river.

      As played, your river bet is only getting called by a better hand, especially considering your bet isn't strong enough to push anyone off. Villain has 2.5/1 pot odds to call your river bet, so he's not going anywhere. Check behind is the best option, IMO.
    • Thorsten77
      Thorsten77
      Black
      Joined: 28.05.2006 Posts: 12,896
      I'd take the freecard on the flop. As played, I don't see any value in a river bet.