[NL2-NL10] nl4 set over set

    • gnawhalak
      Joined: 20.06.2010 Posts: 161
      PartyGaming - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      SB: $5.84
      BB: $1.16
      UTG: $8.40
      MP: $4.17
      CO: $12.10
      Hero (BTN): $4.00

      SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.04

      Pre Flop: ($0.06) Hero has T:diamond: 9:diamond:

      fold, fold, CO calls $0.04, Hero raises to $0.20, fold, fold, CO calls $0.16

      Flop: ($0.46, 2 players) 9:spade: 6:diamond: 9:heart:
      CO checks, Hero checks

      Turn: ($0.46, 2 players) 8:spade:
      CO bets $0.22, Hero raises to $0.82, CO raises to $11.90 and is all-in, Hero calls $2.98 and is all-in

      River: ($8.06, 2 players) 2:club:

      Hero shows T:diamond: 9:diamond: (Three of a Kind, Nines) (PreFlop 34%, Flop 26%, Turn 23%)
      CO shows K:spade: 9:club: (Three of a Kind, Nines) (PreFlop 66%, Flop 74%, Turn 77%)
      CO wins $0.00
      CO wins $7.66

      reviewing the hand. do you think it's right for me to still make the fold on his shove at the turn?

      since the only hands I could think of that could play like that is 1010, two pairs like 86, 88, 9with smaller kicker.
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello gnawhalak,

      Flop: You should be already betting the flop and not Checking behind.

      As played
      Turn: Yep, we should be Raise/Folding in this spot here, 86? 86 ain't really 2pairs cause the 99 on board gives him just pair of 8. :) With even 6x he has 2pairs. Most likely he wouldn't even overplaying any pairs nor PPs here but rather it's going to be a very strong hand. Not that many worse 9x hands either around what we beat.

      Best Regards.