This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] nl4 set over set

    • gnawhalak
      gnawhalak
      Bronze
      Joined: 20.06.2010 Posts: 161
      PartyGaming - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      SB: $5.84
      BB: $1.16
      UTG: $8.40
      MP: $4.17
      CO: $12.10
      Hero (BTN): $4.00

      SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.04

      Pre Flop: ($0.06) Hero has T:diamond: 9:diamond:

      fold, fold, CO calls $0.04, Hero raises to $0.20, fold, fold, CO calls $0.16

      Flop: ($0.46, 2 players) 9:spade: 6:diamond: 9:heart:
      CO checks, Hero checks

      Turn: ($0.46, 2 players) 8:spade:
      CO bets $0.22, Hero raises to $0.82, CO raises to $11.90 and is all-in, Hero calls $2.98 and is all-in

      River: ($8.06, 2 players) 2:club:

      Hero shows T:diamond: 9:diamond: (Three of a Kind, Nines) (PreFlop 34%, Flop 26%, Turn 23%)
      CO shows K:spade: 9:club: (Three of a Kind, Nines) (PreFlop 66%, Flop 74%, Turn 77%)
      CO wins $0.00
      CO wins $7.66


      reviewing the hand. do you think it's right for me to still make the fold on his shove at the turn?

      since the only hands I could think of that could play like that is 1010, two pairs like 86, 88, 9with smaller kicker.
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello gnawhalak,

      Flop: You should be already betting the flop and not Checking behind.

      As played
      Turn: Yep, we should be Raise/Folding in this spot here, 86? 86 ain't really 2pairs cause the 99 on board gives him just pair of 8. :) With even 6x he has 2pairs. Most likely he wouldn't even overplaying any pairs nor PPs here but rather it's going to be a very strong hand. Not that many worse 9x hands either around what we beat.

      Best Regards.