This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Nl10: 66 <> Ss

    • Avatars91
      Avatars91
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.12.2009 Posts: 2,689
      IPoker Network $10.00 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players - View hand 1725443
      DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

      BTN: $1.29 - VPIP: 44, PFR: 16, 3B: 9, AF: 10.0, Hands: 64
      SB: $10.00 - VPIP: 21, PFR: 18, 3B: 7, AF: 7.4, Hands: 515
      BB: $10.80 - VPIP: 19, PFR: 13, 3B: 6, AF: 1.8, Hands: 127
      UTG: $9.81 - VPIP: 29, PFR: 9, 3B: 0, AF: 6.5, Hands: 45
      Hero (MP): $10.52 - VPIP: 22, PFR: 19, 3B: 8, AF: 4.8, Hands: 68874
      CO: $4.02 - VPIP: 44, PFR: 16, 3B: 9, AF: 10.0, Hands: 64

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is MP with 6 :diamond: 6 :heart:
      1 fold, Hero raises to $0.30, 1 fold, BTN calls $0.30, 2 folds

      Flop: ($0.75) 2 :heart: Q :spade: 3 :heart: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN checks

      Turn: ($0.75) 7 :heart: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN checks

      River: ($0.75) 3 :diamond: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN bets $0.30, Hero calls $0.30

      I chose to allow him to bluff me on all 3 streets. Good / bad?
  • 3 replies
    • Kaitz20
      Kaitz20
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      Hi,

      I think 66 is strong enough hand to b/c yourself, since you should protect your hand against random overcards that he might have.
      I would liked inducing bluff a lot more if you have KK on Axx board, since then there can´t be no more scare cards for you

      best regards,
    • Avatars91
      Avatars91
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.12.2009 Posts: 2,689
      I know that the sample size is not too big but he is quite likely not to be a very passive guy.

      Having said that, is his betting range, once I check the flop, not significantly wider than his calling range once I bet? If I bet the bottom part of the range that he is calling/pushing with consists some A high hands maybe some K high hands and all underpairs at best, but no worse. If I check, however, he is extremely more likely to be betting/pushing all the mentioned hands (we do not even know if he is calling with A high or K high if we bet) + all other overcards.

      Taking that into consideration, why is it better to protect? Or is my thought process a bit off?
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Vs his stack I would most likely still Bet/Call as well myself rather than Check. Of course I wouldn't mind even Checking but can you be sure that he bets every time you Check into him? Then of course we plan to Check/Shove.

      If we had something like pair of tens or whatsoever then I wouldn't even mind the Check and let him bluff but your 66 is still pretty vulnerable.