[NL2-NL10] NL5 KQ 3betpot 2P deep

    • Letsdothisish
      Joined: 01.02.2009 Posts: 995
      IPoker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.05 BB (5 handed) - IPoker Converter Tool from nl.FlopTurnRiver.com

      UTG ($5)
      Hero (MP) ($9.46)
      Button ($6.30)
      SB ($9.15)
      BB ($9.83)

      Preflop: Hero is MP with K, Q
      1 fold, Hero bets $0.17, Button calls $0.17, SB raises $0.53, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.38, Button calls $0.38

      Flop: ($1.70) K, J, 3 (3 players)
      SB bets $1.20, Hero calls $1.20, 1 fold

      Turn: ($4.10) Q (2 players)
      SB bets $3.05, Hero raises $7.71 (All-In), SB calls $4.35 (All-In)

      River: ($18.90) 10 (2 players, 2 all-in)

      Total pot: $18.90


      We're both deepstacked.

      Villain who 3bets plays 25/16/ 7.5 3b% but only 3.2 in blinds over 200 hands
      Bu is a 82/28 fish.

      I call the 3bet because it's so small and perhaps the fish goes along in the pot.

      I cant fold TP on flop. On turn I get 2 pair. He continues to barrel but I'm still ahead of AK/KJ/AJ perhaps. Is it better to call?

      If I call and he barrels again on a blank card, can we ever fold? Or what if river is a 10, Ace or a :diamond: ?

      Thank you
  • 2 replies
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Letsdothisish,

      Preflop: Standard fold, why do you want to Call vs such a tight 3bettor and be in multiway pot with such a hand and obviously even deep.

      As played
      Flop: What do you beat on the flop? But now again, why do you Call preflop if you don't continue with TP? :)

      As played
      Turn: AJ/KJ ain't even maybe in his 3betting range. And if you called it flop then on turn there is no way you going to fold the hand:

      Board: K:diamond: J:diamond: 3:heart:  Q:club:
             Equity     Win     Tie
      UTG    39.95%  39.95%   0.00% { JJ+, AKs, AKo }
      UTG+1  60.05%  60.05%   0.00% { KcQd }

      But overall just made a mistake preflop. :)

      Best Regards.
    • Letsdothisish
      Joined: 01.02.2009 Posts: 995
      Ok thank you for the great analysis!