[NL2-NL10] NL2 QQ (co)

    • Skraggy
      Joined: 21.09.2008 Posts: 197
      PokerStars - $0.02 NL - Holdem - 8 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      BTN: $1.24
      SB: $2.00
      BB: $5.86
      UTG: $2.27
      UTG+1: $1.70
      MP: $4.78
      MP+1: $2.64
      Hero (CO): $2.00

      SB posts SB $0.01, BB posts BB $0.02, Hero posts DB $0.02

      Pre Flop: ($0.05) Hero has Q:spade: Q:club:

      fold, UTG+1 calls $0.02, fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.10, fold, fold, fold, UTG+1 calls $0.08

      Flop: ($0.23, 2 players) A:club: J:diamond: K:spade:
      UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $0.16, UTG+1 calls $0.16

      Turn: ($0.55, 2 players) A:diamond:
      UTG+1 checks, Hero checks

      River: ($0.55, 2 players) 6:spade:
      UTG+1 bets $0.14, fold

      UTG+1 wins $0.53

  • 3 replies
    • Imimba1
      Joined: 12.12.2011 Posts: 2,897
      One thing is certain: I would not fold on the river, such a small bet. We only need a little bluffing frequency to make the call +ev.
    • dibolique
      Joined: 15.02.2011 Posts: 19
      Would call river as well he most likely has a Ax (weak kicker), Kx, gut shot T9o or pair smaller than board. We showed weakness and he is just trying to pick up.

      Also his limp per-flop I would interpret as a weak play and therefore assume his bet on the end indicates that he is scared and less likely to have Ax hand.
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Skraggy,

      No need to CB the flop in first place cause you ain't really getting called from a lot worse nor Kx/Ax isn't going to fold.

      As played for the given odds you can as well even Call it down but neither folding ain't wrong if you assume him being passive and not betting with weaker hands.

      Best Regards.