This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL 10 FR Nutflush too passive?

    • salflip
      salflip
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.10.2007 Posts: 606
      I think I played this too passively imo
      $13.33 MP1
      $10 MP3
      $10.77 Hero CO

      I just flat called the flop as mp1 seemed like a bit of a calling station and I didn't want him to fold
      on the turn I checked as I felt he was weak and would maybe call more marginal hands on the river or bluff if I check behind

      looking back I think this was a mistake as he called me down very loose on the river anyway



      Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)         
      Position
      MP3

      0.05/0.10 No-Limit Hold'em (10 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.9 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is CO with K:diamond: , A:diamond:
      3 folds, MP1 calls $0.10, MP2 folds, MP3 calls $0.10, Hero raises to $0.60, 3 folds, MP1 calls $0.50, MP3 calls $0.50.

      Flop: ($1.95) 6:diamond: , 5:diamond: , T:diamond: (3 players)
      MP1 checks, MP3 bets $1.80, Hero calls $1.80, MP1 folds.

      Turn: ($5.55) 2:diamond: (2 players)
      MP3 checks, Hero checks.

      River: ($5.55) J:spade: (2 players)
      MP3 checks, Hero bets $3, MP3 calls $3.00.

      Final Pot: $11.55

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      Hero shows [ Kd, Ad ] a flush, Ace high
      MP3 shows [ 8s, 8c ] a pair of Eights
      Hero wins $10.98 USD with a flush, Ace high.
  • 2 replies