[NL2-NL10] NL4 SH, 55 vs tight/passive OP

    • dienaszaglis
      Joined: 12.06.2008 Posts: 999
      $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Holdem
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

      UTG ($1.85)
      dienaszaglis (UTG+1) ($4.59)
      CO ($4.88)
      BTN ($4.35)
      SB ($4.24)
      BB ($4)

      Pre-Flop: ($0.06, 6 players) dienaszaglis is UTG+1 5:spade: 5:heart:
      1 fold, dienaszaglis raises to $0.16, CO calls $0.16, 3 folds

      Flop: 7:diamond: K:club: A:diamond: ($0.38, 2 players)
      dienaszaglis checks, CO checks

      Turn: 8:diamond: ($0.38, 2 players)
      dienaszaglis checks, CO checks

      River: J:club: ($0.38, 2 players)
      dienaszaglis checks, CO checks

      Final Pot: $0.38
      dienaszaglis shows
      5:spade: 5:heart:
      CO shows
      2:spade: 2:club:

      dienaszaglis wins $0.37 (net +$0.21)

      CO lost $0.16

      Villain is 11/3, AF:0.0, 38h

      I put villain on AJ+, KQ, 22-TT. There is no reason to c-bet. My bet would fold out only worse hands - PP`s. My plan basically is go to SHD or give up.

      Even if his AF is zero, he would bet an A and K, so when he checks back, he`s got a pocket-pair most of the time.

      So, is this a spot for a delayed c-bet? I think, he would fold 66, 99, TT.
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343

      since he would fold better pp-s I would prefer c-betting that spot. Since you didn´t c-bet flop I think he would sometimes call turn his TT/JJ hands and he would likely call pp-s with flushdraw, so without equity you can c/f. If you want to fold out 66/99/TT you can bet 0.25$ on the river

      best regards,