This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL4 SH, 55 vs tight/passive OP

    • dienaszaglis
      Joined: 12.06.2008 Posts: 999
      $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Holdem
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by

      UTG ($1.85)
      dienaszaglis (UTG+1) ($4.59)
      CO ($4.88)
      BTN ($4.35)
      SB ($4.24)
      BB ($4)

      Pre-Flop: ($0.06, 6 players) dienaszaglis is UTG+1 5:spade: 5:heart:
      1 fold, dienaszaglis raises to $0.16, CO calls $0.16, 3 folds

      Flop: 7:diamond: K:club: A:diamond: ($0.38, 2 players)
      dienaszaglis checks, CO checks

      Turn: 8:diamond: ($0.38, 2 players)
      dienaszaglis checks, CO checks

      River: J:club: ($0.38, 2 players)
      dienaszaglis checks, CO checks

      Final Pot: $0.38
      dienaszaglis shows
      5:spade: 5:heart:
      CO shows
      2:spade: 2:club:

      dienaszaglis wins $0.37 (net +$0.21)

      CO lost $0.16

      Villain is 11/3, AF:0.0, 38h

      I put villain on AJ+, KQ, 22-TT. There is no reason to c-bet. My bet would fold out only worse hands - PP`s. My plan basically is go to SHD or give up.

      Even if his AF is zero, he would bet an A and K, so when he checks back, he`s got a pocket-pair most of the time.

      So, is this a spot for a delayed c-bet? I think, he would fold 66, 99, TT.
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343

      since he would fold better pp-s I would prefer c-betting that spot. Since you didn´t c-bet flop I think he would sometimes call turn his TT/JJ hands and he would likely call pp-s with flushdraw, so without equity you can c/f. If you want to fold out 66/99/TT you can bet 0.25$ on the river

      best regards,