This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] 33 flop fullhouse against UTG range

    • Gonchan
      Joined: 14.06.2011 Posts: 2,877
      IPoker, $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
      Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

      UTG: $10.42 (104.2 bb)
      MP: $28.45 (284.5 bb)
      CO: $6.16 (61.6 bb)
      BTN: $10 (100 bb)
      Hero (SB): $10 (100 bb)
      BB: $2.21 (22.1 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is SB with 3 3
      UTG raises to $0.35, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.30, BB folds

      stats is 17/15/706 and af1.6,70CB.

      On this board he rarely hit so if I donk, he may fold with two high card so I chose check/call.

      On turn I thought he don't have PP so turn blank is not good to bet myself.
      Twoover wouldn't call my bet because my range often has PP.

      Flop: ($0.80) 9 9 3 (2 players)
      Hero checks, UTG checks

      Turn: ($0.80) 5 (2 players)
      Hero checks, UTG checks

      River: ($0.80) A (2 players)
      Hero checks, UTG bets $0.60, Hero raises to $2, UTG calls $1.40

      $4.80 pot ($0.32 rake)
      Final Board: 9 9 3 5 A
      UTG showed A K and lost (-$2.35 net)
      Hero mucked 3 3 and won $4.48 ($2.13 net)

      stats is 17/15/706, af 1.6, CB 67.

      on flop, he don't call my donk if he has 2over so I chose check/call.

      on turn,blank didn't help his range and if I bet, it represent I have PP so I chose checkback.(villain's PP is seldom because of flop.)

      on river, it's a good card that helped him(excluding PP from his range, he have A's more often and seldom has KQs) so I chose check/ ammount is good?
  • 2 replies