This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL2 - 97o

    • TJtheTJ
      TJtheTJ
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.10.2011 Posts: 6,587
      PokerStars - $0.02 NL - Holdem - 8 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      UTG: $2.07
      UTG+1: $3.20
      MP: $1.57
      MP+1: $3.07
      CO: $7.20
      BTN: $2.07
      SB: $5.28
      Hero (BB): $1.97

      SB posts SB $0.01, Hero posts BB $0.02

      Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero has 7:diamond: 9:heart:

      fold, fold, MP calls $0.02, fold, fold, fold, SB calls $0.01, Hero checks

      Flop: ($0.06, 3 players) 7:club: 2:spade: 6:diamond:
      SB bets $0.03, Hero calls $0.03, MP calls $0.03

      Turn: ($0.15, 3 players) 2:heart:
      SB checks, Hero bets $0.10, fold, SB calls $0.10

      River: ($0.35, 2 players) A:diamond:
      SB checks, Hero checks



      No specific reads on villains, except both were very loose-passive pre-flop. No post-flop reads at all on SB, MP believes 9 high is worth calling down on three streets with... That's no joke.

      On the flop I don't see how I could possibly fold, because I was pretty likely to just have the best hand. I wasn't too worried about MP in this hand, because he was just terrible. I was definitely ahead of his range.

      On the turn, when SB showed weakness, I tried to just take down the pot, putting him on some sort of straight draw or maybe a 6, so I just didn't want to give him a free card.

      On the river it was a simple check behind for showdown value.

      I am mostly wondering whether it wouldn't have been better to check behind the turn, maybe to induce a bluff on the river or something.
  • 1 reply